Abstract
Abstract
Background
In many market settings individuals are encouraged to switch health care providers as a means of ensuring more competition. Switching may have a potentially undesirable side effect of increasing unnecessary treatment. Focusing on the most common source of medical radiation (dental X-rays), the purpose of this study was to assess whether, upon switching dentist, X-ray exposure increases depending on the type of provider payment.
Methods
The analysis used longitudinal data from 2005 to 2016 covering a 5% random sample of the Scottish adult population covered by the National Health Service (NHS). Multiple fixed-effects panel regression analyses were employed to determine the correlation of provider remuneration with patients’ likelihood of receiving an X-ray upon switching to a new dentist other things equal. A broad set of covariates including a patient’s copayment status was controlled for.
Results
Upon switching to a dentist who was paid fee-for-service, patients had a by 9.6%-points (95% CI 7.4–11.8%) higher probability of receiving an X-ray, compared to switching to a salaried dentist. Results were robust when accounting for patient exemption status, as well as unobserved patient and dentist characteristics.
Conclusions
In comparison to staying with the same dentist, patients may be exposed to substantially more X-rays upon switching to a dentist who is paid fee-for-service. There may need to be better guidance and regulation to protect the health of those who have to switch provider due to moving and greater caution in advocating voluntary switching.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. Dan, S., Andrews, R.: Market-type mechanisms and public service equity: a review of experiences in European public services. Public Organ Rev. 16(3), 301–317 (2016)
2. Trescher, A.-L., Listl, S., Van Der Galien, O., Gabel, F., Olivier, K.: Once bitten, twice shy? Lessons learned from an experiment to liberalize price regulations for dental care. Eur. J. Heal. Econ. 21, 425–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01145-z
3. NHS Scotland.: Your choices in the NHS [Internet]. (2019). https://www.nhs.uk/using-the-nhs/about-the-nhs/your-choices-in-the-nhs/. (Accessed date 2020 Jul 16).
4. Ikegami, N.: Fee-for-service payment – an evil practice that must be stamped out? Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 4(2), 57–59 (2015).
5. Brenner, D.J., Doll, R., Goodhead, D.T, et al.: Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100(24), 13761–13766 (2003)