Abstract
AbstractBackgroundRare diseases negatively impact patients’ quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging.ObjectivesThis study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included in manufacturers’ submissions of orphan drugs to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with those of published studies addressing the same rare diseases to understand whether manufacturers fully exploited the existing literature in developing their economic models.MethodsAll NICE Technology Appraisal (TA) and Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance documents of non-cancer European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal products were reviewed and compared with any published primary studies, retrieved via PubMed until November 2020, and estimating HSUVs for the same conditions addressed in manufacturers’ submissions.ResultsWe identified 22 NICE TA/HST appraisal reports addressing 19 different rare diseases. Sixteen reports presented original HSUVs estimated using EQ-5D or Health Utility Index (n = 12), direct methods (n = 2) or mapping (n = 2), while the other six included values obtained from the literature only. In parallel, we identified 111 published studies: 86.6% used preference-based measures (mainly EQ-5D, 60.7%), 12.5% direct techniques, and 2.7% mapping. The collection of values from non-patient populations (using ‘vignettes’) was more frequent in manufacturers’ submissions than in the literature (22.7% vs. 8.0%).ConclusionsThe agreement on methodological choices between manufacturers’ submissions and published literature was only partial. More efforts should be made by manufacturers to accurately reflect the academic literature and its methodological recommendations in orphan drugs submissions.
Funder
European Commission
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference160 articles.
1. Bogart, K.R., Irvin, V.L.: Health-related quality of life among adults with diverse rare disorders. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 12(1), 177 (2017)
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims (2009). https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims. Accessed 16 Mar 2021
3. Weldring, T., Smith, S.M.: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv. Insights 6, 61–68 (2013)
4. Bansback, N., Harrison, M., Brazier, J., Davies, L., Kopec, J., Marra, C., et al.: Health state utility values: a description of their development and application for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 59(7), 1018–1026 (2008)
5. Lamers, L.M.: The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets. Med. Care 45(3), 238–244 (2007)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献