Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Comparative economic assessments of renal replacement therapies (RRT) are common and often used to inform national policy in the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to assess existing cost-effectiveness analyses of dialysis modalities and consider whether the methods applied and results obtained reflect the complexities of the real-world treatment pathway experienced by ESRD patients.
Methods
A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify cost-effectiveness studies of dialysis modalities from 2005 onward by searching Embase, MEDLINE, EBM reviews, and EconLit. Economic evaluations were included if they compared distinct dialysis modalities (e.g. in-centre haemodialysis [ICHD], home haemodialysis [HHD] and peritoneal dialysis [PD]).
Results
In total, 19 cost-effectiveness studies were identified. There was considerable heterogeneity in perspectives, time horizon, discounting, utility values, sources of clinical and economic data, and extent of clinical and economic elements included. The vast majority of studies included an incident dialysis patient population. All studies concluded that home dialysis treatment options were cost-effective interventions.
Conclusions
Despite similar findings across studies, there are a number of uncertainties about which dialysis modalities represent the most cost-effective options for patients at different points in the care pathway. Most studies included an incident patient cohort; however, in clinical practice, patients may switch between different treatment modalities over time according to their clinical need and personal circumstances.
Promoting health policies through financial incentives in renal care should reflect the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive approach that considers different RRTs along the patient pathway; however, no such evidence is currently available.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. Stringer, S., et al.: The natural history of, and risk factors for, progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD): the Renal Impairment in Secondary care (RIISC) study; rationale and protocol. BMC Nephrol. 14, 95–95 (2013)
2. The Renal Association UK Renal Registry: 22nd Annual Report. (2018) 04/08/2020; Available from: https://www.renalreg.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/22nd_UKRR_ANNUAL_REPORT_FULL.pdf
3. Gomez, A.T., et al.: Comorbidity burden at dialysis initiation and mortality: a cohort study. Can. J. Kidney Health Dis. 2, 34–34 (2015)
4. Crews, D.C., et al.: Low income, community poverty and risk of end stage renal disease. BMC Nephrol. 15(1), 192 (2014)
5. The Renal Association: Assessment of the potential kidney transplant recipient, 5th edn. The Renal Association (2011)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献