Financial risk allocation and provider incentives in hospital–insurer contracts in The Netherlands

Author:

Gajadien Chandeni S.ORCID,Dohmen Peter J. G.,Eijkenaar Frank,Schut Frederik T.,van Raaij Erik M.,Heijink Richard

Abstract

AbstractIn healthcare systems with a purchaser–provider split, contracts are an important tool to define the conditions for the provision of healthcare services. Financial risk allocation can be used in contracts as a mechanism to influence provider behavior and stimulate providers to provide efficient and high-quality care. In this paper, we provide new insights into financial risk allocation between insurers and hospitals in a changing contracting environment. We used unique nationwide data from 901 hospital–insurer contracts in The Netherlands over the years 2013, 2016, and 2018. Based on descriptive and regression analyses, we find that hospitals were exposed to more financial risk over time, although this increase was somewhat counteracted by an increasing use of risk-mitigating measures between 2016 and 2018. It is likely that this trend was heavily influenced by national cost control agreements. In addition, alternative payment models to incentivize value-based health care were rarely used and thus seemingly of lower priority, despite national policies being explicitly directed at this goal. Finally, our analysis shows that hospital and insurer market power were both negatively associated with financial risk for hospitals. This effect becomes stronger if both hospital and insurer have strong market power, which in this case may indicate a greater need to reduce (financial) uncertainties and to create more cooperative relationships.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference67 articles.

1. ACM.: Zorgverzekeraars mogen extra kosten corona-aanpak onderling verdelen. Retrieved from https://www.acm.nl/nl/publicaties/zorgverzekeraars-mogen-extra-kosten-corona-aanpak-onderling-verdelen (2020)

2. Allen, P., Petsoulas, C.: Pricing in the English NHS quasi market: a national study of the allocation of financial risk through contracts. Public Money Manag. 36(5), 341–348 (2016)

3. Anselmi, L., Borghi, J., Brown, G.W., Fichera, E., Hanson, K., Kadungure, A., Sutton, M., et al.: Pay for performance: a reflection on how a global perspective could enhance policy and research. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 9(9), 365–369 (2020)

4. Ashton, T., Cumming, J., McLean, J.: Contracting for health services in a public health system: the New Zealand experience. Health Policy 69(1), 21–31 (2004)

5. Barros, P., Braun, G.: Upcoding in a national health service: the evidence from Portugal. Health Econ. 26(5), 600–618 (2016)

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3