Determination of the target population in early benefit assessments in Germany: challenges for non-small-cell lung cancer

Author:

ten Thoren C.,Balg C.,Gibbert J.,Mostardt S.,Ripoll M.,Schierbaum D.,Schiller S.,Schwalm A.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Dossiers submitted for early benefit assessments in Germany also provide information on the precise determination of the target population (patients eligible for a drug). The situation is complex for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to highly specific therapeutic indications. Our aim was to compare the different methodological steps applied to determine the target population in dossiers on drugs for NSCLC. Methods We analysed NSCLC dossiers assessed by the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) between 01.01.2011 and 31.12.2017. Methodological details regarding the determination of the target population were extracted and compared. Results We analysed 23 NSCLC dossiers. In all dossiers, the target population was determined using the number of all patients with lung cancer as the basis for calculations. This patient population was further reduced in several successive steps by assuming proportions of patients with a specific characteristic (e.g. disease stage). The most important calculation steps were patients with NSCLC (n = 23 dossiers), with a specific disease stage (n = 23), with a specific tumour mutation (n = 14), with a specific tumour histology (n = 7), without prior treatment (n  = 15), with pretreatment in second or further treatment lines (n  = 17), and/or with specific pretreatments (n  = 9). The proportions of patients determined within the same calculation step varied considerably between dossiers. Discussion The calculation methods applied and the target population sizes reported in NSCLC dossiers vary considerably. A consensus with regard to the databases and calculation methods used to determine the target population in NSCLC would be helpful to reduce variations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference65 articles.

1. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Verordnung über die Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln nach § 35a Absatz 1 SGB V für Erstattungsvereinbarungen nach § 130b SGB V (Arzneimittel-Nutzenbewertungsverordnung - AM-NutzenV). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/am-nutzenv/gesamt.pdf (2014). Accessed 16 Feb 2016

2. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss: Verfahrensordnung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses. https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-1002/VerfO_2014-12-18_iK-2015-04-16.pdf (2015). Accessed 16 Feb 2016

3. Skipka, G., Wieseler, B., Kaiser, T., Thomas, S., Bender, R., Windeler, J., Lange, S.: Methodological approach to determine minor, considerable, and major treatment effects in the early benefit assessment of new drugs. Biom. J. 58(1), 43–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201300274

4. Hörn, H., Nink, K., McGauran, N., Wieseler, B.: Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany: results from 2011 to 2012. Health Policy 116(2–3), 147–153 (2014)

5. Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen: General methods: version 5.0. https://www.iqwig.de/download/General-Methods_Version-5-0.pdf (2018). Accessed 06 Jun 2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3