Very high and low residual spenders in private health insurance markets: Germany, The Netherlands and the U.S. Marketplaces

Author:

McGuire Thomas G.,Schillo Sonja,van Kleef Richard C.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractWe study the extremely high and low residual spenders in individual health insurance markets in three countries. A high (low) residual spender is someone for whom the residual—spending less payment (from premiums and risk adjustment)—is high (low), indicating that the person is highly underpaid (overpaid). We begin with descriptive analysis of the top and bottom 1% and 0.1% of residuals building to address the question of the degree of persistence in membership at the extremes. Common findings emerge among the countries. First, the diseases found among those with the highest residual spending are also disproportionately found among those with the lowest residual spending. Second, those at the top of the residual spending distribution (where spending exceeds payments the most) account for a massively high share of the unexplained variance in the predictions from the risk adjustment model. Third, in terms of persistence, we find that membership in the extremes of the residual spending distribution is highly persistent, raising concerns about selection-related incentives targeting these individuals. As our results show, the one-in-a-thousand people (on both sides of the residual distribution) play an outsized role in creating adverse incentives associated with health plan payment systems. In response to the observed importance of the extremes of the residual spending distribution, we propose an innovative combination of risk-pooling and reinsurance targeting the predictively undercompensated group. In all three countries, this form of risk sharing substantially improves the overall fit of payments to spending. Perhaps surprisingly, by reducing the burden on diagnostic indicators to predict high payments, our proposed risk sharing policy reduces the gap between payments and spending not only for the most undercompensated individuals but also for the most overcompensated people.

Funder

Laura and John Arnold Foundation

National Institute of Health Care Management

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference23 articles.

1. Bakx, P., O’Donnell, O., van Doorslear, E.: Spending on health care in the Netherlands: not going so Dutch. Fiscal Stud. 37(3–4), 593–625 (2016)

2. Cohen, S., Yu, W.: The concentration and persistence in the level of health expenditures over time: estimates for the US population, 2008–2009. Statistical brief no. 354; Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st354/stat354.pdf (2012). Accessed 25 Aug 2020

3. DeLia, D.: Mortality, disenrollment, and spending persistence in medicaid and CHIP. Med. Care 55(3), 220–228 (2017)

4. Drösler, S., Garbe, E., Hasford, J., Schubert, I., Ulrich, V., van de Ven, W., Wambach, A. Wasem J., Wille, E.: Sondergutachten zu den Wirkungen des morbiditätsorientierten Risikostrukturausgleichs. https://www.bundesversicherungsamt.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Risikostrukturausgleich/20180125Sondergutachten_Wirkung_RSA_2017_korr.pdf (2017). Accessed 25 Aug 2020

5. Enthoven, A.C.: Health Plan. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading MA (1980)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3