Abstract
AbstractBiotic interactions (e.g., predation, competition, commensalism) where organisms directly or indirectly influenced one another are of great interest to those studying the history of life but have been difficult to ascertain from fossils. Considering the usual caveats about the temporal resolution of paleontological data, traces and trace fossils in the sedimentary record can record co-occurrences of organisms or their behaviours with relatively high spatial fidelity in a location. Neoichnological studies and studies on recently buried traces, where direct trophic links or other connections between tracemakers are well-known, may help interpret when and where overlapping traces represented true biotic interactions. Examples from Holocene paleosols and other buried continental sediments in Poland include the tight association between mole and earthworm burrows, forming an ichnofabric representing a predator–prey relationship, and that of intersecting insect and root traces demonstrating the impact of trees as both ecosystem engineers and the basis for food chains. Trampling by ungulates, which leaves hoofprints and other sedimentary disturbances, may result in amensal or commensal effects on some biota in the short term and create heterogeneity that later trace-making organisms, such as invertebrate burrowers, can also respond to in turn, though such modified or composite traces may be challenging to interpret.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference140 articles.
1. Ainley DG, Dugger KD, Ford RG, Pierce SD, Reese DC, Brodeur RD, Tynan CT, Barth JA (2009) Association of predators and prey at frontal features in the California Current: competition, facilitation, and co-occurrence. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 389:271–294. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08153
2. Aleksiev AS, Longdon B, Christmas MJ, Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (2007) Individual choice of building material for nest construction by worker ants and the collective outcome for their colony. Anim Behav 74:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.019
3. Allport HA, Davies NS, Shillito AP, Mitchell EG, Herron ST et al (2022) Non-palimpsested crowded Skolithos ichnofabrics in a Carboniferous tidal rhythmite: Disentangling ecological signatures from the spatio-temporal bias of outcrop. Sedimentology 69(3):1028–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12947
4. Andriuzzi WS, Wall DH (2018) Soil biological responses to, and feedbacks on, trophic rewilding. Phil Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 373:20170448
5. Baets KD, Huntley JW, Klompmaker AA, Schiffbauer JD, Muscente AD (2021) The fossil record of parasitism: its extent and taphonomic constraints. In: De Baets K, Huntley JW (eds) The Evolution and Fossil Record of Parasitism. Springer, Cham, pp 1–50
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献