Author:
Saisho Hiroyuki,Tayama Keiichiro,Shimoishi Koichiro,Hori Hidetsugu,Okazaki Teiji
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference7 articles.
1. Santini F, Luciani GB, Restivo S, et al. Over twenty-year follow-up of the standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the mitral position. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S232–5.
2. Nishida T, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, et al. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitral valve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1614–20.
3. Shimazaki Y, Kuraoka S, Takeda F, et al. Mitral valve re-replacement for impaired bioprosthesis after 19 years in a patient undergoing steroid treatment. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;12:45–7.
4. Niinami H, Naito Y, Koyanagi H, et al. Malfunction of a Hancock bioprosthesis in the mitral position 24 years after initial implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9:810–2.
5. Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Tugtekin SM, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for deteriorated mitral valve bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:111–7.