Is there anybody out there? Can individual loneliness, need for closure, and religiosity predict the belief in extraterrestrial life and intelligence?

Author:

Döbler Niklas AlexanderORCID,El Amri YassinORCID,Carbon Claus-ChristianORCID

Abstract

AbstractThinking about the universe also includes thinking about hypothetical extraterrestrial intelligence. Two key questions arise: Why are we thinking about them in the first place? And why are we anthropomorphizing them? One possible explanation may be that the belief in extraterrestrials results from a subjective feeling of loneliness or the need for closure. Results of an online questionnaire (N = 130) did not reveal a confident and consistent correlation between personal feelings of aloneness or need for closure and belief in extraterrestrial life or intelligence. The same was true for the anthropomorphic representation of extraterrestrial intelligence. The belief in extraterrestrial life was negatively linked to frequent religious activity, and to a lesser and more uncertain extent, to the belief in extraterrestrial intelligence. As evidenced by their parameter estimates, participants demonstrated an intuitive grasp of the probabilities inherent in the Drake equation. However, there was significant variability in the solutions provided. When asked to describe hypothetical extraterrestrials, participants mainly assessed them in terms connoted with physical appearance, neutral to humans, and partially influenced by anthropomorphism. Given the severe limitations, we conservatively conclude that individual loneliness is indeed individual and does not break the final frontier, that is, space.

Funder

Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference102 articles.

1. Masetti M. How Many stars in the milky way? 2015. https://asd.gsfc.nasa.gov/blueshift/index.php/2015/07/22/how-many-stars-in-the-milky-way/. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.

2. Döbler NA. Where will they be: hidden implications of solutions to the Fermi paradox. Int J Astrobiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355042200012X.

3. Bradbury RJ, Ćirković MM, Dvorsky G. Dysonian approach to SETI: a fruitful middle ground? J Br Interplanet Soc. 2011;64:156–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/184844a0.

4. Haqq-Misra J, Ashtari R, Benford J, Carroll-Nellenback J, Döbler NA, Farah W, et al. Opportunities for technosignature science in the planetary science and astrobiology decadal survey: arXiv. 2022.

5. Haqq-Misra J, Berea A, Balbi A, Grimaldi C. Searching for technosignatures: Implications of detection and non-detection. Bulletin of the AAS. 2019. 51.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3