From one end of the scale to the other: overweight and obese individuals’ experiences with anorexic attitudes, cognitions, and behaviours

Author:

Beaulieu Danie A.,Best Lisa A.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe weight-based definition of anorexia nervosa (AN) can result in heavier individuals being excluded from evidence-based interventions and erroneously included in practices with negative physical and psychological consequences. Our purpose was to address the AN weight criteria limitation by expanding upon the components of disordered eating underlying membership in weight categories that are considered unhealthy. In this cross-sectional study, 733 male and female participants completed online questionnaires assessing age, gender, BMI (height and weight), and disordered eating behaviours and attitudes. Participants were grouped according to their weight status (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese). Results indicated that BMI was positively associated with many aspects of disordered eating but was inversely associated with restricting eating, excessive exercise, and muscle building in women. Underweight men and women reported similar levels of body dissatisfaction, but compared to men, the effect was much more pronounced in women as weight increased. Taken together, lighter-weight individuals reported higher levels of AN-specific behaviour (restricting eating) compared to heavier-weight participants. In contrast, heavier-weight individuals had higher AN-related attitudes, cognitions, and behaviours, such as body dissatisfaction, cognitive restraint, and binge eating. These results support that AN attitudes, cognitions, and behaviours can be found in individuals regardless of whether they are underweight or obese. Future research is needed to develop interventions addressing anorexic symptoms in people considered overweight or obese to meet their specific needs.

Funder

University of New Brunswick Graduate Studentship

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3