Bayesian versus Frequentist approaches in Psychometrics: a bibliometric analysis

Author:

Zagaria AndreaORCID,Lombardi Luigi

Abstract

AbstractThe increasing popularity of the Bayesian approach in Psychology has prompted metascientific efforts to quantify its prevalence. However, despite enduring debates between proponents of Frequentist and Bayesian schools of thought, no systematic comparison of their prominence has been conducted in existing literature. This brief report fills this gap, examining Bayesian and Frequentist trends in the period from 1964 to 2023 through a meticulous search in PsycINFO. The findings reveal that the Frequentist approach has consistently been more popular than the Bayesian approach in the realm of Psychometrics and Statistical Psychology. However, Bayesian contributions steadily increased from the 80’s onward and appear to be almost as important or even surpassing the Frequentist counterparts in the latest years investigated (2019–2023). Although this observation applies primarily to specialized literature rather than the entire domain of Psychology, it underscores the growing prevalence of the Bayesian approach, signaling attention among specialists in the field.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference16 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. APA PsycInfo Classification Categories and Codes. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/class-codes?_gl=1*ev1jwt*_ga*MjQwMjQzMDE0LjE2OTk4Mjk0NTI.*_ga_SZXLGDJGNB*MTY5OTgyOTQ1Mi4xLjAuMTY5OTgyOTQ1NC4wLjAuMA. Accessed on 12 Nov 2023.

2. American Psychological Association. Guide to the fields in APA Database records. 2020. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/field-guide. Accessed 03 Jan 2024.

3. Andrews M, Baguley T. Prior approval: the growth of Bayesian methods in psychology. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013;66(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12004.

4. Friman PC, Allen KD, Kerwin ML, Larzelere R. Changes in modern psychology: a citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. Am Psychol. 1993;48(6):658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.658.

5. Gurrin LC, Kurinczuk JJ, Burton PR. Bayesian statistics in medical research: an intuitive alternative to conventional data analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6(2):193–204. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00216.x.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3