The Doctor as Parent, Partner, Provider… or Comrade? Distribution of Power in Past and Present Models of the Doctor–Patient Relationship

Author:

Shutzberg ManiORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe commonly occurring metaphors and models of the doctor–patient relationship can be divided into three clusters, depending on what distribution of power they represent: in the paternalist cluster, power resides with the physician; in the consumer model, power resides with the patient; in the partnership model, power is distributed equally between doctor and patient. Often, this tripartite division is accepted as an exhaustive typology of doctor–patient relationships. The main objective of this paper is to challenge this idea by introducing a fourth possibility and distribution of power, namely, the distribution in which power resides with neither doctor nor patient. This equality in powerlessness—the hallmark of “the age of bureaucratic parsimony”—is the point of departure for a qualitatively new doctor–patient relationship, which is best described in terms of solidarity between comrades. This paper specifies the characteristics of this specific type of solidarity and illustrates it with a case study of how Swedish doctors and patients interrelate in the sickness certification practice.

Funder

Södertörn University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference65 articles.

1. Angell, M. (1993). The doctor as double agent. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 3(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0253

2. Árnason, V. (1994). Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship. Theoretical Medicine, 15(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313339

3. Alexanderson, K., Arrelöv, B., Friberg, E., et al. (2018). Läkares erfarenheter av arbete med sjukskrivning av patienter. Huvudrapport 2018 [Physicians’ experiences of handling sickness certification of patients. Main report 2018]. Karolinska institutet.

4. Altermark, N. (2020). Avslagsmaskinen [The rejection machine]. Verbal förlag.

5. Bayertz, K. (1999). Four uses of “solidarity.” In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarity. (pp. 3–28). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3