Premature Death as a Normative Concept

Author:

Sørheim PrebenORCID,Barra MathiasORCID,Norheim Ole FrithjofORCID,Gamlund EspenORCID,Solberg Carl TollefORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe practical goal of preventing premature death seems uncontroversial. But the term ‘premature death’ is vague with several, sometimes conflicting definitions. This ambiguity results in several conceptions with which not all will agree. Moreover, the normative rationale behind the goal of preventing premature deaths is masked by the operational definition of existing measures. In this article, we argue that ‘premature death’ should be recognized as a normative concept. We propose that normative theories should be used to justify measures of premature death to provide them with normative validity and public legitimacy.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

The Norwegian Directorate of Health

University of Bergen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference47 articles.

1. U.N. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210049603.

2. Murray, C. J. L. (1996). Rethinking DALYs. In C. J. L. Murray & A. Lopez (Eds.), The global burden of disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020; summary (pp. 1–98). Harvard School of Public Health.

3. Solberg, C. T., Sørheim, P., Müller, K. E., Gamlund, E., Norheim, O. F., & Barra, M. (2020). The devils in the DALY: Prevailing evaluative assumptions. Public Health Ethics, 13(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phaa030

4. Scottish Government. Long-term Monitoring of Health Inequalities: January 2021 Report. An Official Statistics Publication for Scotland. [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/long-term-monitoring-health-inequalities-january-2021-report/

5. Satz, D. (2010). Ideals of egalitarianism and sufficiency in global justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 40(sup1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2010.10717654

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3