The Ethics of Decentralized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent: Taking Technologies’ Soft Impacts into Account
-
Published:2024-05-19
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1065-3058
-
Container-title:Health Care Analysis
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Health Care Anal
Author:
van Rijssel Tessa I.ORCID, van Thiel Ghislaine J. M. W.ORCID, van Delden Johannes J. M.ORCID,
Abstract
AbstractDecentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have the potential to advance the conduct of clinical trials, but raise several ethical issues, including obtaining valid informed consent. The debate on the ethical issues resulting from digitalization is predominantly focused on direct risks relating to for example data protection, safety, and data quality. We submit however, that a broader view on ethical aspects of DCTs is needed to touch upon the new challenges that come with the DCT practice. Digitalization has impacts that go beyond its direct purposes, by shaping behaviors, experiences, social relations, and values. We examine four elements of the informed consent procedure that are affected by DCTs, while taking these soft impacts of technologies into account: (i) informing participants and testing understanding, (ii) freedoms in relation to responsibilities and burdens, (iii) trust in participant-researcher relations, and (iv) impacts on the concept of privacy. Our analysis reveals that a broad view is key for optimal conduct of DCTs. In addition, it provides insight into the ethical impacts of DCTs on informed consent. Technologies such as DCTs potentially have profound impacts which are not immediately addressed by the existing regulatory frameworks, but nonetheless important to recognize. These findings can guide future practices of DCTs to foster the important values of clinical research in this novel approach for conducting clinical trials.
Funder
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Anderson, E. E., Newman, S. B., & Matthews, A. K. (2017). Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 8(3), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1362488 2. Apostolaros, M., Babaian, D., Corneli, A., Forrest, A., Hamre, G., Hewett, J., Podolsky, L., Popat, V., & Randall, P. (2020). Legal, regulatory, and practical issues to consider when adopting decentralized clinical trials: Recommendations from the clinical trials transformation initiative. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 54(4), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-019-00006-4 3. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Respect for autonomy. In Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed., pp. 99–142). Oxford University Press. 4. Blacksher, E., & Moreno, J. D. (2008). Informed consent. In E. J. Emanuel, C. C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, & D. Wendler (Eds.), The oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (1 ed., pp. 589–670). Oxford University Press. 5. Breslin, S., Shareck, M., & Fuller, D. (2019). Research ethics for mobile sensing device use by vulnerable populations. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.035
|
|