Engaging Tomorrow’s Doctors in Clinical Ethics: Implications for Healthcare Organisations

Author:

Machin Laura L.ORCID,Proctor Robin D.

Abstract

AbstractClinical ethics can be viewed as a practical discipline that provides a structured approach to assist healthcare practitioners in identifying, analysing and resolving ethical issues that arise in practice. Clinical ethics can therefore promote ethically sound clinical and organisational practices and decision-making, thereby contributing to health organisation and system quality improvement. In order to develop students’ decision-making skills, as well as prepare them for practice, we decided to introduce a clinical ethics strand within an undergraduate medical curriculum. We designed a programme of clinical ethics activities for teaching and assessment purposes that involved using ethical frameworks to analyse hypothetical and real-life cases in uni- and inter- professional groups. In this paper, we draw on medical student feedback collected over 6 years to illustrate the appeal to students of learning clinical ethics. We also outline the range of benefits for students, healthcare organisations, and the field of clinical ethics arising from tomorrow’s doctors experiencing clinical ethics early in their training. We conclude by briefly reflecting on how including clinical ethics within tomorrow’s doctors curricular can secure and continue future engagement in clinical ethics support services in the UK, alongside the dangers of preparing students for organisational cultures that might not (yet) exist. We anticipate the findings presented in the paper will contribute to wider debates examining the impact of ethics teaching, and its ability to inform future doctors’ practice.

Funder

University of Lancaster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference47 articles.

1. Agich, G. J. (2013). Education and the improvement of clinical ethics services. BMC Medical Education, 13, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-41.

2. Austin, L. (2018). UK processes for resolution of disagreements about the care of critically ill children. Resource document. Retrieved 1 April 2020 from, https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Disagreements-in-the-care-of-critically-ill-children.pdf.

3. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1989). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

5. Campbell, A. V., Chin, J., & Voo, T. C. (2007). How can we know that ethics education produces ethical doctors? Medical Teacher, 29, 431–436.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3