The Role of Transparency in Digital Contact Tracing During COVID-19: Insights from an Expert Survey
-
Published:2024-06-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1065-3058
-
Container-title:Health Care Analysis
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Health Care Anal
Author:
Krämer DennisORCID, Brachem Elisabeth, Schneider-Reuter Lydia, D’Angelo Isabella, Vollmann JochenORCID, Haltaufderheide JoschkaORCID
Abstract
AbstractHealth technologies such as apps for digital contract tracing [DCT] played a crucial role in containing and combating infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their primary function was to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by consistently generating and disseminating information related to various events such as encounters, vaccinations or infections. While the functionality of DCT has been well researched, the necessity of transparency in the use of DCT and the consent to share sensitive information such as users’ health, vaccination and location status remains unclear. On one hand, DCT enabled the continuous monitoring of various risk factors, including data-based calculations of infection probabilities. On the other hand, digital monitoring of health risks was closely associated with various uncertainties, such as the ambiguous storage of personal data and its potential future misuse, e.g., by tech companies or health authorities. Our contribution aims to retrospectively analyze the COVID-19 pandemic from a post-pandemic perspective and utilize it as a case study for the implementation of new technological measures. We argue that under the condition of voluntary use of DCT, transparency plays a key role in convincing individuals to install health technologies on their mobile devices, keep them activated and consent to the sharing of sensitive data. We support our argument with qualitative data from an expert survey conducted between 2020 and 2021 and analyzed according to the principles of Grounded Theory.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Universität Münster
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Abeler, J., Bäcker, M., Buermeyer, U., & Zillessen, H. (2020). COVID-19 contact tracing and data protection can go together. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(4), e19359. https://doi.org/10.2196/19359 2. Afroogh, S., Esmalian, A., Mostafavi, A., Akbari, A., Rasoulkhani, K., Esmaeili, S., & Hajiramezanali, E. (2022). Tracing app technology: An ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-19. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09659-6 3. Bengio, Y., Janda, R., Yu, Y. W., Ippolito, D., Jarvie, M., Pilat, D., Struck, B., Krastev, S., & Sharma, A. (2020). The need for privacy with public digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Digital Health, 2(7), e342–e344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30133-3 4. Blasimme, A., Ferretti, A., & Vayena, E. (2021). Digital contact tracing against COVID-19 in Europe: Current features and ongoing developments. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 660823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.660823 5. Borsci, S., Buckle, P., Walne, S., Salanitri, D. (2019). Trust and Human Factors in the Design of Healthcare Technology. In. S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, Y. Fujita (Ed.), In: Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 207–215). Berlin: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_21
|
|