Comparative In Vivo Study of Solid-Type Pure Hyaluronic Acid in Thread Form: Safety and Efficacy Compared to Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Polydioxanone Threads

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Although various products are commonly used for skin rejuvenation, solid-type hyaluronic acid (HA) as an injectable form has not been researched or utilized. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of solid-type HA in thread form, which differs from the conventional gel-type HA commonly used. Method Solid-type HA threads, conventional HA fillers, and polydioxanone (PDO) threads were inserted into the dorsal subcutaneous layer of mice. Photographs were taken on days 0, 1, 3, and 7, and on day 7, the samples were harvested for histological analysis. Inflammatory reactions and detection of collagen were confirmed through tissue staining, and real-time PCR was conducted to quantify collagen synthesis. Results In the histological analysis, the PDO threads exhibited a greater inflammatory response compared to the HA threads. Masson’s trichrome staining revealed a higher degree of collagen synthesis in the HA thread group compared to the HA filler group. While collagen type 1 expression was significantly higher in the PDO thread group than in the HA thread group, the HA thread group showed higher expression levels of collagen type 3. Furthermore, the PDO thread group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in TGF-β1 compared to the HA group. Conclusion This in vivo study demonstrated the stable application of solid-type pure HA threads and their potential for inducing collagen production, while also yielding a low inflammatory response. The findings highlight the promising applications of solid-type HA in the field of cosmetic dermatology. No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.