Abstract
Abstract
Background
Indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) is a useful tool for evaluating mastectomy skin flap (MSF) perfusion during breast reconstruction. However, a standardized protocol for interpreting and applying MSF perfusion after mastectomy has not been established yet. The purpose of this study is to establish criteria for assessing MSF perfusion in immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction while correlating ICG-A findings with postoperative outcomes
Methods
This prospective observational study was conducted at a single institution and involved patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction between August 2021 and August 2023. The terms “hypoperfused flap” and “hypoperfused area” were defined according to ICG-A perfusion. MSF exhibited < 30% perfusion, excluding the nipple and the corresponding region, respectively. Data on the hypoperfused flap, hypoperfused area, and MSF necrosis were collected.
Results
Fifty-three breast cases were analyzed. Eight patients developed MSF necrosis (15.1%, 8/53). Of these, two patients underwent surgical debridement and revision within 3 months (3.8%, 2/53). There were nine cases of a hypoperfused flap, eight of which developed MSF necrosis. The hypoperfused flap was a significant predictor of the occurrence of MSF necrosis (p < 0.001). There was a tendency for increased full-thickness necrosis with a wider hypoperfused area.
Conclusions
The hypoperfused flap enabled the prediction of MSF necrosis with high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Considering the presumed correlation between the extent of the hypoperfused area and the need for revision surgery, caution should be exercised when making intraoperative decisions regarding the reconstruction method.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Funder
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
Seoul National University Hospital
National Research Foundation of Korea
Seoul National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Hong KY, Son Y, Chang H, Jin US (2018) Trends in breast reconstruction: implications for the national health insurance service. Arch Plast Surg 45(3):239–245
2. Kim MJ, Mok JH, Lee IJ, Lim H (2023) Mastectomy skin flap stability prediction using indocyanine green angiography: a randomized prospective trial. Aesthet Surg J 43(12):NP1052–NP1060
3. Jagsi R, Li Y, Morrow M et al (2015) Patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation and mastectomy with and without reconstruction: results of a survey of breast cancer survivors. Ann Surg 261(6):1198–1206
4. Howard MA, Sisco M, Yao K et al (2016) Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. J Surg Oncol 114(4):416–422
5. Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD et al (2014) Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 72(Suppl 1):S48–S52