Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To quantitatively assess the periocular asymmetry and investigate its sex and age-related differences in a Caucasian population using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry.
Method
Standardized 3D photos of the periocular region of 301 Caucasians were taken using the VECTRA M3 3D Imaging System. Standardized landmarks were positioned, and data measurements in the periocular region were obtained from these images using VAM software and assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability. Absolute differences and asymmetry index between the right and the left periocular region were calculated with a focus on gender and age-related differences.
Result
Fissure height asymmetry was positively correlated with age (p < 0.01). Furthermore, reflex distance asymmetry was positively correlated with age in the elderly group (p < 0.05). Absolute differences of upper eyelid crease were 0.65 ± 0.79 mm for females and 0.90 ± 0.94 mm for males (p < 0.05). In the elderly group, the absolute differences of reflex distance were 0.664 ± 0.471 mm for males and 0.470 ± 0.408 mm for females (p < 0.05), while the absolute differences of fissure height were 0.619 ± 0.469 mm and 0.436 ± 0.372 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). All measurements had an inter-rater ICC and intra-rater ICC between 0.761 and 0.957.
Conclusion
Periocular asymmetry is more prominent in older and male people. 3D photogrammetry is a reliable tool to detect periocular asymmetry and might provide an accurate and effective reference for periocular cosmetic, plastic, and reconstructive surgery in the clinical routine.
Level of Evidence I
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S (2009) Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Physiol (Oxf) 131(2):136–142
2. Zaidel DW, Cohen JA (2005) The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int J Neurosci 115(8):1165–1173
3. Liu MT, Iglesias RA, Sekhon SS et al (2014) Factors contributing to facial asymmetry in identical twins. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):638–646
4. Finsterer J (2003) Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthet Plast Surg 27(3):193–204
5. Thakker MM, Rubin PA (2002) Mechanisms of acquired blepharoptosis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15(1):101–111