Abstract
Abstract
Background
Given that scars are acknowledged as the primary cause of postoperative dissatisfaction following reduction mammoplasty, it is imperative to comprehend the patient’s visual perception of different scar patterns in order to enhance patient satisfaction. To achieve this, eye-tracking technology provides an unbiased method of evaluating how observers assess breast scars.
Methods
58 participants (32 females and 26 males) between the ages of 19 and 82 years (mean age of 29.47 ± 10.98 years) were shown 18 color photographs, taken at 3 viewing angles (right 45° oblique, frontal and frontal view with arms raised), from 6 patients undergone reduction mammoplasty with the inverted T-scar technique (3 patients) or no-vertical-scar technique (3 patients). The images were presented to every participant for a fixed duration of 5 s each. Eye-tracking device was used to collect and analyze the gaze data of viewers.
Results
The nipple-areola complex (NAC) and the periareolar scar captured observers’ gaze faster, had longer duration and more count of eye fixation than all other parts of breast scars, regardless of the viewing angle and scar pattern. Moreover, the scar region in the inverted T-scar pattern received greater and faster visual attraction of observer’s gaze than the no-vertical-scar pattern.
Conclusion
The NAC and the periareolar scar seem to be perceived as the most important regions for breast aesthetics. The findings can be helpful to assist plastic surgeons in determining the most appropriate technique for reduction mammoplasty, meanwhile underlining the importance of a fine periareolar scar and symmetric NAC for excellent aesthetic outcomes.
This is to our best knowledge the first study using eye-tracking technology in evaluating reduction mammoplasty outcomes.
This study explored the influence of different scar patterns after reduction mammoplasty on eye movements and gaze patterns among observers.
The study have validated the significance of the NAC and the periareolar scar for breast aesthetics and revealed that the scar region in the inverted T-scar pattern may be judged less visually attractive than the no-vertical-scar pattern.
Level of Evidence V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Menendez-Cardo A, Guillen-Grima F, Hontanilla B (2017) Analysis of satisfaction after breast reduction comparing vertical scar versus inverted T-shaped technique using the Breast-Q questionnaire. Is patient satisfaction influenced by the amount of tissue removed? J Plast Surg Hand Surg 51(6):414–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2017.1291432
2. Vazquez OA, Yerke HP, Komberg J, Slutsky HL, Becker H (2022) Free nipple graft breast reduction without a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(3):e4167. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004167
3. Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J, Griffin PA, Dean NR (2019) Outcomes of breast reduction surgery using the BREAST-Q: a prospective study and comparison with normative data. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(5):1034–1044. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006114
4. Sachs D, Szymanski KD (2023) Breast reduction. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing
5. The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) (2021) ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2021. 2023;(9 Jan 2023)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献