Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The present study was designed to compare the graft resorption characteristics of autogenous cartilage from the septum, auricle, and costal in the superficial muscular aponeurotic system of the nasal dorsum of the rabbit model.
Methods
Equal-sized perichondrium-free septal, auricular, and costal cartilage grafts were collected from fifteen New Zealand white rabbits. Cartilage grafts were taken at the scale of two grafts from each animal’s ear, two from its costal part, and one from its septum. Costal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, elastic cartilage grafts that were shaped with a micro-motor device and monopolar electrocautery, and septal cartilage grafts that were shaped with a scalpel were all implanted into the dorsum of rabbit’s noses to create five groups. All autogenous cartilage tissues were removed 3 months later. Cartilages were evaluated for histological features, graft mass, and chondrocyte density resorption.
Results
The elastic cartilage group, where electrocautery was used to shape the cartilage, had a higher resorption score than the other groups. The costal cartilage graft shaped with a micro-motor was also observed to have the best cartilage regeneration score.
Conclusion
We observed that the resorption of costal cartilage was lower than that of ear and septum cartilage. It was determined that micro-motor application for the shaping process caused less resorption and stimulated more regeneration than cautery application.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Motamed S, Torbati PM, Arani HZ, Motabar AR, Zabolian A, Madadi Z (2019) Effects of the human amniotic membrane on the cartilage graft: prognosis and absorption in white rabbits. World J Plast Surg 8(2):219
2. Buyuklu F, Cakmak O (2007) Histological analysis of human diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):348–349
3. Da Silva BSR, Dolci JEL (2014) Experimental study of the use of auricular cartilage with and without Gelfoam® on the nasal dorsum of rabbits. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:111–119
4. Lee TY, Lee KI, Dhong ES, Jeong SH, Kim DW, Han SK (2022) Long-term resorption rate of autogenous onlay graft in East Asian rhinoplasty: a retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 149(2):360–371. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008793
5. Çöloğlu H, Uysal A, Tiftikçioğlu YÖ, Oruç M, Koçer U, Çoşkun E et al (2012) Comparison of autogenous cartilage, acellular dermis, and solvent-dehydrated pericardium for the prevention and correction of dorsal nasal irregularities: an experimental study. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):732–741