Author:
Kim Youngil,Evans Jason P.,Sharma Ashish
Abstract
AbstractImproving modeling capacities requires a better understanding of both the physical relationship between the variables and climate models with a higher degree of skill than is currently achieved by Global Climate Models (GCMs). Although Regional Climate Models (RCMs) are commonly used to resolve finer scales, their application is restricted by the inherent systematic biases within the GCM datasets that can be propagated into the RCM simulation through the model input boundaries. Hence, it is advisable to remove the systematic biases in the GCM simulations prior to downscaling, forming improved input boundary conditions for the RCMs. Various mathematical approaches have been formulated to correct such biases. Most of the techniques, however, correct each variable independently leading to physical inconsistencies across the variables in dynamically linked fields. Here, we investigate bias corrections ranging from simple to more complex techniques to correct biases of RCM input boundary conditions. The results show that substantial improvements in model performance are achieved after applying bias correction to the boundaries of RCM. This work identifies that the effectiveness of increasingly sophisticated techniques is able to improve the simulated rainfall characteristics. An RCM with multivariate bias correction, which corrects temporal persistence and inter-variable relationships, better represents extreme events relative to univariate bias correction techniques, which do not account for the physical relationship between the variables.
Funder
University of New South Wales
ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Bates B, Kundzewicz Z, Wu S, Palutikof J (2008) Climate change and water. In: Technical paper VI of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, pp 1–210
2. Bruyere CL, Done JM, Holland GJ, Fredrick S (2014) Bias corrections of global models for regional climate simulations of high-impact weather. Clim Dyn 43:1847–1856
3. Caldwell P, Chin HNS, Bader DC, Bala G (2009) Evaluation of a WRF dynamical downscaling simulation over California. Climatic Change 95:499–521
4. Cannon AJ (2016) Multivariate bias correction of climate model output: matching marginal distributions and intervariable dependence structure. J Clim 29:7045–7064
5. Cannon AJ (2017) Multivariate quantile mapping bias correction: an N-dimensional probability density function transform for climate model simulations of multiple variables. Clim Dyn 50:31–49
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献