Abstract
AbstractWe investigated the relationship between the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), which has remained unknown to date. Reanalysis data and linear baroclinic model experiments were employed in our study. The results showed significant correlation between the March NAO and the boreal summer and autumn IOD, independent of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation signal, verified by partial correlation analysis. Air–sea interaction over the western North Pacific (WNP) is a significant aspect of the physical mechanism through which the March NAO affects the subsequent IOD. A strong positive March NAO induces equivalent barotropic cyclonic circulation over the WNP through a steady Rossby wave, accompanied by a local tripole sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly pattern. Facilitated by local air–sea positive feedback, the low-level cyclonic circulation and associated precipitation anomalies over the WNP persist from early spring to summer and shift equatorward. During May–June, the WNP anomalous cyclone strengthens the southeasterly wind and enhances cooling off Sumatra–Java through local meridional circulation. Such circulation ascends over the WNP and descends over the tropical southeastern Indian Ocean and Maritime Continent. Subsequently, wind–evaporation–SST and wind–thermocline–SST positive feedback in the tropical Indian Ocean contribute to IOD development. A diagnosis of ocean mixed-layer heat budget indicated that the ocean dynamic process associated with the NAO contributes more to IOD development than does atmospheric thermal forcing. Determining the influence mechanism of the March NAO on the subsequent IOD is considered useful in advancing the seasonal prediction of IOD.
Funder
the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. Annamalai H, Murtugudde R, Potemra J et al (2003) Coupled dynamics over the Indian Ocean: spring initiation of the Zonal Mode. Deep-Sea Res Part II-Top Stud Oceanogr 50:2305–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(03)00058-4
2. Balmaseda MA, Mogensen K, Weaver AT (2013) Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system ORAS4. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139:1132–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2063
3. Behringer DW, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation sysytem at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. Eighth Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Washington 11–15
4. Boer GJ (1986) A comparison of mass and energy budgets from 2 fgge-datasets and a gcm. Mon Weather Rev 114:885–902. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114%3c0885:Acomae%3e2.0.Co;2
5. Cai WJ, Zheng XT, Weller E et al (2013) Projected response of the Indian Ocean Dipole to greenhouse warming. Nat Geosci 6:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2009
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献