Abstract
AbstractGlobal climate models (GCMs) and Earth system models (ESMs) exhibit biases, with resolutions too coarse to capture local variability for fine-scale, reliable drought and climate impact assessment. However, conventional bias correction approaches may cause implausible climate change signals due to unrealistic representations of spatial and intervariable dependences. While purely data-driven deep learning has achieved significant progress in improving climate and earth system simulations and predictions, they cannot reliably learn the circumstances (e.g., extremes) that are largely unseen in historical climate but likely becoming more frequent in the future climate (i.e., climate non-stationarity). This study shows an integrated trend-preserving deep learning approach that can address the spatial and intervariable dependences and climate non-stationarity issues for downscaling and bias correcting GCMs/ESMs. Here we combine the super-resolution deep residual network (SRDRN) with the trend-preserving quantile delta mapping (QDM) to downscale and bias correct six primary climate variables at once (including daily precipitation, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed) from five state-of-the-art GCMs/ESMs in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). We found that the SRDRN-QDM approach greatly reduced GCMs/ESMs biases in spatial and intervariable dependences while significantly better-reducing biases in extremes compared to deep learning. The estimated drought based on the six bias-corrected and downscaled variables captured the observed drought intensity and frequency, which outperformed state-of-the-art multivariate bias correction approaches, demonstrating its capability for correcting GCMs/ESMs biases in spatial and multivariable dependences and extremes.
Funder
National Science Foundation
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Agbazo MN, Grenier P (2020) Characterizing and avoiding physical inconsistency generated by the application of univariate quantile mapping on daily minimum and maximum temperatures over Hudson Bay. Int J Climatol 40:3868–3884
2. Ahmadalipour A, Moradkhani H, Demirel MC (2017) A comparative assessment of projected meteorological and hydrological droughts: elucidating the role of temperature. J Hydrol 553:785–797
3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome 300:D05109
4. Ansari R, Casanueva A, Liaqat MU, Grossi G (2023) Evaluation of bias correction methods for a multivariate drought index: case study of the Upper Jhelum Basin. Geoscientific Model Development 16:2055–2076
5. Arik SO, NC Yoder, and T Pfister (2022) Self-adaptive forecasting for improved deep learning on non-stationary time-series. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02403