Author:
Kovács Réka Lilla,Daróczi Lajos,Barkóczy Péter,Baradács Eszter,Bakonyi Eszter,Kovács Szilvia,Erdélyi Zoltán
Abstract
AbstractIn this work, we evaluate the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), the permeability (P), solubility (S), and diffusion (D) coefficients of Paraloid B44, Paraloid B72, and Incralac coatings in the temperature range of 5–35°C. The Arrhenius function—diffusion activation energy and preexponential factor—has also been determined from the data: $$D_{B44} = 35.2\;{\text{cm}}^{2} \;{\text{s}}^{ - 1} \exp \left( { - 25\;{\text{kJ mol}}^{ - 1} /{\text{RT}}} \right)$$
D
B
44
=
35.2
cm
2
s
-
1
exp
-
25
kJ mol
-
1
/
RT
; $$D_{B72} = 9.5\;{\text{cm}}^{2} \;{\text{s}}^{ - 1} \exp \left( { - 23\;{\text{kJ mol}}^{ - 1} /{\text{RT}}} \right)$$
D
B
72
=
9.5
cm
2
s
-
1
exp
-
23
kJ mol
-
1
/
RT
; $$D_{\text{Incralac}} = 622.8\;{\text{cm}}^{2} \;{\text{s}}^{ - 1} { \exp }\left( { - 28\;{\text{kJ mol}}^{ - 1} /{\text{RT}}} \right)$$
D
Incralac
=
622.8
cm
2
s
-
1
exp
-
28
kJ mol
-
1
/
RT
. These resins are important coating materials, for example, for conservators to protect metallic artifacts, such as statues, against corrosion. Despite Paraloid B44 and B72 resins being considered as reference materials in conservation practice, that is, new coating materials (either water vapor retarders or transmitters) are often compared to them, there are no comprehensive data for the quantities describing the vapor permeability (P, S, D) of these materials. The measurements are based on the ISO cup-method using substrate/coating composite samples. The strength of this technique is that it can also be used when the coating is non-self-supporting; nevertheless, P, S, and D can be deduced for the coating layer itself, and it seems to be a standardizable procedure for comparative performance testing of coating materials. Paraloid B72 layers exhibited higher WVTRs—from 39 to 315 g m−2 day−1 as the temperature increased from 5 to 35°C—compared to Paraloid B44 and Incralac coatings—from 17 to 190 g m−2 day−1, respectively. The transmission rate parameters were also compared to the results of corrosion tests. Incralac was the most effective corrosion inhibitor, and the performance of the B44 was better than the B72, which is in good agreement with the transmission rate tests.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Colloid and Surface Chemistry,Surfaces, Coatings and Films,Surfaces and Interfaces,General Chemistry
Reference48 articles.
1. Funke, W, “Problems and Progress in Organic Coatings Science and Technology.” Prog. Org. Coat., 31 (1–2) 5–9 (1997)
2. Werner, A, “Synthetic Materials in Art Conservation.” J. Chem. Educ., 58 (4) 321–324 (1981)
3. Horie, CV, Materials for Conservation—Organic Consolidants: Adhesives and Coatings. Architectural Press, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1987)
4. Boyatzis, S C, Veve, A, Kriezi, G, Karamargiou, G, Kontou, E, Argyropoulos, V, “A Scientific Assessment of the Long-Term Protection of Incralac Coatings on Ancient Bronze Collections in the National Archaeological Museum and the Epigraphic and Numismatic Museum in Athens, Greece.” In: Daehner, J M (ed.) Artistry in Bronze The Greeks and Their Legacy XIXth International Congress on Ancient Bronzes, pp. 300–311. The J. Paul Getty Museum and the Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles (2017)
5. Funke, W., “Mechanisms of Protecting Metals by Organic Coatings Against Corrosion.” In: Kendig, MW, Leidheiser H, Jr (ed.) Corrosion Protection by Organic Coatings, Electrochemical Proceedings Volume 87–2, The Electrochemical Society Inc., Pennington, NJ (1987)