1. Biderman, A. D., and Cantor, D. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of bounding, respondent conditioning and mobility as sources of panel bias in the National Crime Survey.Proceedings of the Section for Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 708–713.
2. Bonney, G. E. (1987). Logistic regression for dependent binary observations.Biometrics 43: 951–974.
3. Cantor, D. (1989). Substantive implications of selected operational longitudinal design features: The National Crime Survey as a case study. In Kasprzyk, D., Duncan, G., Kalton, G., and Singh, M. P. (eds.),Panel Surveys, Wiley, New York, pp. 25–51.
4. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The measurement of crime victimization: prospects for panel analysis of a panel survey.Statistician 29: 313–350.
5. Fienberg, S. E. (1989). Modeling considerations: discussion from a modeling perspective. In Kasprzyk, D., Duncan, G., Kalton, G., and Singh, M. P. (eds.),Panel Surveys, Wiley, New York, pp. 566–574.