Cross-cultural Comparison of Recovery College Implementation Between Japan and England: Corpus-based Discourse Analysis
-
Published:2024-07-05
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1557-1874
-
Container-title:International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Ment Health Addiction
Author:
Kotera YasuhiroORCID, Miyamoto Yuki, Vilar-Lluch Sara, Aizawa Ikuya, Reilly Owen, Miwa Akihiro, Murakami Michio, Stergiopoulos Vicky, Kroon Hans, Giles Kirsty, Garner Kennedyrae, Ronaldson Amy, McPhilbin Merly, Jebara Tesnime, Takhi Simran, Repper Julie, Meddings Sara, Jepps Jessica, Simpson Adelabu Jonathan, Kellermann Vanessa, Arakawa Naoko, Henderson Claire, Slade Mike, Eguchi Shigeyuki
Abstract
AbstractRecovery Colleges (RCs) are mental health learning communities, operated in 28 countries across cultures. However, the RC operational model is informed by Western countries sharing similar cultural characteristics such as individualism and short-term orientation. How RC operational model needs to be adapted to non-Western culture remains unknown. We investigated how RCs are introduced to the public in two countries with contrasting cultural characteristics: Japan (collectivism, long-term) and England (individualism, short-term). Corpus-based discourse analysis on 22,827 words from promotional texts (13 RCs in Japan, 61 in England) revealed that both countries emphasised mental illness lived experiences. In Japan, the focus was on the relational and long-term aspects of recovery. In England, the focus was on personal learning and skill acquisition. People attending RCs in Japan may anticipate experiencing collectivistic and long-term elements, which are viewed unfavourably in the operational model. Findings suggest refinements to the operational model to include under-represented cultural characteristics.
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11. 2. Arundell, L.-L., Barnett, P., Buckman, J. E. J., Saunders, R., & Pilling, S. (2021). The effectiveness of adapted psychological interventions for people from ethnic minority groups: a systematic review and conceptual typology. Clinical Psychology Review, 88, 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102063 3. Bester, K. L., McGlade, A., & Darragh, E. (2022). Is co-production working well in recovery colleges? Emergent themes from a systematic narrative review. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 17(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-05-2021-0046 4. Bourne, P., Meddings, S., & Whittington, A. (2018). An evaluation of service use outcomes in a Recovery College. Journal of Mental Health, 27(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417557 5. Cronin, P., Stein-Parbury, J., Sommer, J., & Gill, K. H. (2021). What about value for money? A cost benefit analysis of the South Eastern Sydney Recovery and Wellbeing College. Journal of Mental Health, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1922625
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|