The Meaning of Stigma About Illegal Drug Use and Its Contribution to Public Policymaking in Colombia

Author:

Tirado-Otálvaro Andrés FelipeORCID,Castaño-Perez Guillermo Alonso,Yepes-Delgado Carlos Enrique

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this study is to understand the meaning of the stigma about illegal drug consumption and its contribution to public policymaking in Colombia from the perspective of experts on this topic. Research was carried out based on the methodological perspective of the grounded theory. Twenty participants with extensive experience in the design of regulations, plans, or programs about demand reduction in Colombia were interviewed, using tools such as in-depth interviews and analytical memos. The analysis was performed by means of open, axial, and selective coding techniques and the development of a conditional/consequential matrix. The findings are presented according to the structure of the pattern matrix to show the social process found and include (a) the phenomenon, the fear of being stigmatized as a promoter of more liberal public policies; (b) the context, the Colombia’s history and the policymaking to reduce drug consumption; (c) the conditions, control of governance by influential groups in power; and (d) the strategies to address it, prioritize less sensitive issues, and the consequences, formulation of repressive public policies with the impact on the rights of people who use drugs. From the perspective of the interviewees, the fear of being stigmatized as promoters of more liberal public policies and contrary to the expectations of the social and power classes leads the rulers to have a low-profile discourse on this subject so as not to assume the costs politicians that this fact would imply.

Funder

Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

Pontifical Bolivarian University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference29 articles.

1. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press.

2. Buchanan, D., Shaw, S., Ford, A., & Singer, M. (2003). Empirical science meets moral panic: An analysis of the politics of needle exchange. Journal of Public Health Policy, 24(3), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.2307/3343386

3. Can, G., & Tanriverdi, D. (2015). Social functioning and internalized stigma in individuals diagnosed with substance use disorder. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 29(6), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2015.07.008

4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.

5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3