Abstract
AbstractThis article analyses a conflict that erupted in 2021 between the government of Zimbabwe and the people of Chilonga in the south of the country over the expropriation of their ancestral for the production of lucerne grass. The people of Chilonga resisted being displaced from land to which they are deeply attached and have a sacred connection. This conflict provides a rare opportunity to analyze the often marginalized, muted and misunderstood sacred roots of the environmental conflict that shape collective agency. The article uses the concepts of emplacement and disemplacement to comprehend the deeper and more intangible impacts of displacing people from their grazing lands, sources of water and traditional herbs and medicines, and sacred sites—natural resources they claim to be sacred. Thus, while disemplacement has been used to explain why people find themselves moving, the article uses it to show the opposite: why they resist moving and demonstrate the not easily measured losses upon which resistance to moving hinges.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Aplin, Graeme. 2004. Kakadu National Park World Heritage Site: Deconstructing the Debate, 1997–2003. Australian Geographical Studies 42(2):152–174.
2. Arenas, L.C. 2007. The U’wa community’s battle against the oil companies: a local struggle turned global. In Knowledge is possible: beyond northern Epistemologies, ed. Santos B. De Sousa, Another, 120–147. London: Verso.
3. Artur, Luis, and Dorothea Hilhorst. 2014. Floods, resettlement, and land access and use in the Lower Zambezi, Mozambique. Land Use Policy 36:361–368.
4. Borde, Radhika, and Bettina Bluemling. 2020. Representing indigenous sacred land. Capitalism, Nature Socialism 32(1):68–87.
5. Brandt, Fremke, and Marja Spierenburg. 2014. Game fences in the Karoo: reconfiguring spatial and social relations. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 32:220–237.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献