The vitality of religious communities—A contribution model based on the sociological and theological discourse

Author:

Zimmer MiriamORCID,Sellmann Matthias

Abstract

AbstractThe article elaborates a concept of the vitality of religious communities. Defined on the basis of previous research, it enables an identification of the determinants that make a (religious) collective vital. An examination of the theoretical discourse and recent studies on religious vitality reveals two distinct discussions. On the one hand, the sociology of religion that disregards the mesolevel; on the other, theology typically lacks a scientific foundation. This paper integrates the strength of both disciplines: the former’s explicit operationalization and abstract reflection along with the latter’s sensemaking and proximity to the field. In doing so, we provide a definition of the vitality of religious communities on the basis of the discussion of the vitality of species and ecosystems in life science. This definition is further refined with a view to organizational studies. Here, the vitality of religious communities can be described and measured in four dimensions: (operative) functionality, (shared) identity, (situational) performance, and (transformational) impact. Theological discourse and recent research point to four attributes of a (religious) community that are expected to influence vitality: professionalism, spirituality, contextuality and intentionality. Finally, the contribution model brings together the vitality dimensions and its influence factors in a coherent framework, offering concrete hypotheses for further research in both disciplines and guidance for empirical research.

Funder

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference69 articles.

1. Albert, Stuart, and David A. Whetten. 1985. Organizational Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior 7:263–295.

2. Berger, Peter L. 1969. The sacred canopy. Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor.

3. Bishwas, Sumant Kumar. 2011. Conceptualization of organization vitality based on strategic knowledge management. Global Journal of e‑Business & Knowledge Management 7(1):45–52.

4. Bishwas, Sumant Kumar. 2015. Achieving organization vitality through innovation and flexibility: an empirical study. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 16(2):145–156.

5. Bishwas, Sumant Kumar, and Sushil. 2015. Critical processes for organization vitality: a conceptual study. In Systemic flexibility and business agility, ed. Sushil, Gerhard Chroust, 223–234. New Delhi: Springer. Flexible Systems Management.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3