The myth of Muslim violence: Theorizing religion in the war on terror

Author:

Schmiedel UlrichORCID

Abstract

AbstractBoth inside and outside the academy, identifications of Islam as a terrorist threat have gained traction during the on-going War on Terror. William Cavanaugh’s conceptualization and critique of what he calls “the myth of religious violence” claims to offer a critique of these identifications. This critique has been influential across a variety of disciplines. In this article, I assess both his more philosophical-critical and his more theological-constructive accounts of religion to argue that Cavanaugh’s myth is, essentially, apologetics. Cavanaugh’s apologetics for the church camouflages the differential treatment of religions during the War on Terror. If it has been about a myth at all, then the War on Terror has been about the myth of Muslim violence. Christianity past and present has condoned and contributed to this very myth. What is needed, then, is a conception and a critique of “religion” that, in contrast to Cavanaugh’s analysis, can account for the significance of Christianity for the differential treatment of religions in the public square, both descriptively and prescriptively.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference76 articles.

1. Adib-Moghaddam, Arshin. 2013. A metahistory of the clash of civilisations: us and them beyond orientalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, 2nd edn., London: Verso.

3. Anderson, Braden P. 2012. Chosen nation: scripture, theopolitics, and the project of national identity. Eugene: Cascade.

4. Appleby, R. Scott. 2000. The ambivalence of the sacred. Religion, violence and reconciliation. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

5. Appleby, R. Scott. 2010. Fire & sword. Does religion promote violence? Commonweal 137(7):12–14.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3