In-class examinations in college-level science: New theory, new practice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In-class examinations in college-level science: New theory, new practice

Published:1996-12 Issue:4 Volume:5 Page:311-320
ISSN:1059-0145
Container-title:Journal of Science Education and Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Sci Educ Technol

Author:

Tobias Sheila,Raphael Jacqueline B.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01677127.pdf

Reference24 articles.

1. Bykerk-Kauffman, A. (1996). Geological Sciences, Chico State University, California.

2. Chase and Jacobs, Guide for Faculty, p. 14.

3. di Sessa, A.A., and Ploger, D. (1987). Cognition and Science Education. In Champagne, A.B., and Hornig, L.E. (Eds.), American Association of Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. p. 21.

4. Dougherty, R., Tobias, S., and Raphael. J. (1994). The Contract Alternative: An Experiment in Teaching and Assessment in Undergraduate Science.AAHE Bulletin. February.

5. Hestenes, D. Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. (1994. Force Concept Inventory.The Physics Teacher, 30: (March).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom;SAGE Open;2021-04

2. How is that done? Student views on resources used outside the engineering classroom;European Journal of Engineering Education;2017-11-05

3. Comparison of integrated testlet and constructed-response question formats;Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research;2014-09-22

4. Evaluating multiple-choice exams in large introductory physics courses;Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research;2006-07-28