Abstract
AbstractThe clean air interstate rule (CAIR) was a regional cap-and-trade program announced in 2005 which covered 27 eastern US states and sought to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. The rule was later vacated after a court found that the non-targeted design of the program did not comply with the Clean Air Act provision to regulate interstate air pollution. Using a custom air pollution dispersion model, I calculate the interstate SO2 pollution from 493 coal-fired power plants across the United States between 1997 and 2020. In a difference-in-differences setup with plants not covered by CAIR in the control group, I estimate the treatment effect of the program on overall- and cross-border SO2 emissions and find a 24% reduction in overall emissions and reduces the risk that a plant violates air quality standards across state borders by 2–4%. I report evidence of heterogeneous treatment effects where the reduction in overall emissions attributed to CAIR is lower among plants transporting SO2 in excess of 1% of the National Air Quality Standards to another state.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference74 articles.
1. Abdel-Rahman AA (2008) On the atmospheric dispersion and gaussian plume model. In: 2nd international conference on waste management, water pollution, air pollution, indoor climate, p 31–39
2. Arguez A, Durre I, Applequist S, Vose RS, Squires MF, Yin X, Heim RR Jr, Owen TW (2012) NOAA’s 1981–2010 us climate normals: an overview. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(11):1687–1697
3. Barreca AI, Neidell M, Sanders NJ (2021) Long-run pollution exposure and mortality: evidence from the acid rain program. J Public Econ 200:104440
4. Berck P, Moe-Lange J, Stevens A, Villas-Boas S (2016) Measuring consumer responses to a bottled water tax policy. Am J Agric Econ 98(4):981–996
5. Berge L et al (2018) Efficient estimation of maximum likelihood models with multiple fixed-effects: the R package fenmlm. Technical report, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg