Abstract
AbstractIn the face of a shrinking budget for environmental activities, conservation agencies must design and implement agri-environmental policies that cost-effectively meet the environmental objectives. However, designing such programs is often challenging due to different uncertainties. For example, landholders may be exposed to risks when carrying out conservation projects. To minimise the negative impact of unexpected losses, landholders may require additional financial incentives as compensation for undertaking “risky” conservation projects. In such situations, the conservation agency risks over-spending public funds because of prohibitively high opportunity costs from landholders or failing to meet the environmental target. We used analytical and simulation approaches to explore optimal budget allocation in a target-constrained conservation tender. We also compared the performance of the tender with and without own-cost uncertainty. Results showed that as landholders’ own-cost uncertainty rises, the conservation agency is forced to allocate more funding to secure the same level of the environmental target. We found that the optimal funding level is sensitive to landholders’ competition uncertainty and the magnitude of expected losses.
Funder
The University of Western Australia Scholarship for International Research Fund
Australian Research Council, Discovery Project
Australian Research Council, DECRA Project
University of Western Australia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference36 articles.
1. Ajayi OC, Jack BK, Leimona B (2012) Auction design for the private provision of public goods in developing countries: lessons from payments for environmental services in Malawi and Indonesia. World Dev 40(6):1213–1223
2. Ansell D, Gibson F, Salt D (2016) Learning from agri-environment schemes in Australia: investing in biodiversity and other ecosystem services on farms. ANU Press, Canberra
3. Arnold MA, Duke JM, Messer KD (2013) Adverse selection in reverse auctions for ecosystem services. Land Econ 89(3):387–412
4. Balakrishnan N (2007) Permanents, order statistics, outliers, and robustness. Rev Mat Complut 20(1):7–107
5. Banerjee S, Conte MN (2018) Information access, conservation practice choice, and rent seeking in conservation procurement auctions: evidence from a laboratory experiment. Am J Agric Econ 100(5):1407–1426
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献