Comparing low-temperature thermal and plasma sintering processes of a tailored silver particle-free ink

Abstract

AbstractSilver particle-free inks are under rapid development due to their unique properties. Currently, most of the developed silver particle-free inks contain multiple components. In addition to the necessary solvents and silver precursors, these inks also contain complexing agents, reducing agents, and various additives. While such complex compositions assure good stability and printability of the inks, they hamper the sintering process as excess time and energy are often required to remove residues from various compositions to ensure high conductivities of the printed structures. Thus, a simple ink system is expected. On the other hand, plasma sintering shows its sintering potential in treating silver particle-free inks, but is only employed for the sintering of silver nitrate or silver acetate-based inks. Consequently, developing new particle-free ink systems with simple compositions and exploring the potential of plasma sintering is very meaningful. In this work, a clear and transparent silver particle-free ink was formulated, which can be treated both by low-pressure argon plasma sintering and low-temperature thermal sintering (120–160 °C). The roles of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) in the ink formulation were investigated in detail, which not only acts as the solvent but also as the complexing agent for silver oxalate to lower the sintering temperature of the ink. The electrical performance of the formulated ink was examined for both sintering processes for different conditions. The thermal sintering resulted in a resistivity value of 24.3 μΩ·cm on glass substrates after treatment at 160 °C for 60 min, while the plasma sintering yielded a resistivity value of 29 μΩ·cm at 500 W for 30 min. Compared to thermal sintering, plasma sintering achieved a similar electrical performance, but with a more nonuniform film structure. The power, sintering time, and the pressure of argon are key factors responsible for the conductivity of the produced films. Nevertheless, both resistivity values do meet the minimal electrical requirements of most electronic applications.