Abstract
Abstract
Definition of the problem
Obesity is a burgeoning challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. In times of demographic change, it also affects an increasing number of older persons, presenting substantial challenges to delivering health and nursing care in both acute and long-term care (LTC) settings. So far, a detailed analysis of the diverse group of 65+ in this field is missing, particularly in the area of LTC. The needs of neither care recipients, nor those of nurses and institutions are monitored, analyzed, or systematically evaluated. Moreover, ethical implications of professional care for older persons with obesity have not yet been discussed in research and policy.
Arguments
We argue that a needs-based approach is appropriate to address these ethical complexities. We further argue that a comprehensive mapping of the ethical terrain is best from an interdisciplinary and mixed methods perspective. For this, we conduct a scoping review to synthesize the state-of-the-art in both the healthcare and LTC settings; and we focus on challenges reported in case studies from professional care settings in European and North American institutions.
Conclusion
Our findings point to a lack of research on ethical issues related to the LTC needs of older persons living with obesity and the challenges faced by their professional carers. From the limited number of (case) studies that can be found, however, a series of ethical concerns emerge that have direct import for access, utilization, and quality of care. Accordingly, a new research agenda is needed to inform an ethical approach for policy and practice. It must be rooted in a concern for both care recipients and caregivers in mixed methods studies. Future research should provide criteria for balancing needs, allocating resources and developing practical solutions for people who are confronted with multiple stigma.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference97 articles.
1. Albrecht A, Kaspar R, Simonson J, Stuth S, Hameister N, Tesch-Römer C, Wagner M, Zank S (2022) Hohes Alter in Deutschland (D80+): Repräsentativbefragung 2020. Forschungsdatenzentrum des Deutschen Zentrums für Altersfragen, Berlin. Scientific Use File Version 1.0. https://doi.org/10.5156/D80/2022/M.001
2. Alves S, Duarte N, Ferreira M, Paúl C (2024) Exploring dementia-friendly environments in long-term care facilities: perspectives from multiple stakeholders in Portugal. J Aging Environ. https://doi.org/10.1080/26892618.2024.2302190
3. Apelt G, Ellert S, Kuhlmey A, Garms-Homolová V (2012) Zeitliche und strukturelle Unterschiede in der Pflege adipöser und nicht-adipöser Bewohner(innen) vollstationärer Pflegeeinrichtungen. Pflege 25:271–283
4. Apelt G, Kuhlmey A, Garms-Homolová V (2014) Versorgung adipöser Menschen aus der Perspektive von Leitungskräften vollstationärer Pflegeeinrichtungen. Z Gerontol Geriatr 47:673–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-013-0572-y
5. Auffenberg J, Becka D, Evans M, Kokott N, Schleicher S, Braun E (2022) „Ich pflege wieder, wenn …“ – Potenzialanalyse zur Berufsrückkehr und Arbeitszeitaufstockung von Pflegefachkräften. Ein Kooperationsprojekt der Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen, des Instituts Arbeit und Technik Gelsenkirchen und der Arbeitskammer des Saarlandes. https://www.iat.eu/aktuell/veroeff/2022/becka_evans_kokott_schleicher02.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2023