Reexamination of traditional emphases in faculty development-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reexamination of traditional emphases in faculty development

Published:1984 Issue:2 Volume:21 Page:195-209
ISSN:0361-0365
Container-title:Research in Higher Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Res High Educ

Author:

Boice Robert

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00975105.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Andrasik, F., Heimberg, J. S., and McNamara, J. R. Behavior modification of work and work-related problems.Progress in Behavior Modification 1981,11 117?161.

2. Arreola, R. A. Establishing successful faculty evaluation and development programs. In A. Smith (Ed.),Evaluating faculty and staff. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.

3. Arrowsmith, W. The future of teaching. In C. B. T. Lee (Ed.),Improving College Teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1967.

4. Bergquist, W. H. and Phillips, S. R.A handbook for faculty development. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Council for Advancement of Small Colleges, 1975.

5. Boice, R. Scholarly activities rating scale. State University of New York at Albany, 1980 (mimeographed).

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What kind of faculty are motivated to perform research by the desire for promotion?;Higher Education;2006-09-02

2. Integration: Evaluating faculty work as a whole;New Directions for Institutional Research;2002

3. Sociology research at liberal arts colleges;The American Sociologist;2001-09

4. Psychology Research at Liberal Arts Colleges;Teaching of Psychology;1999-04

5. References;ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report;1995-02