Abstract
AbstractNoise shaping (NS) filters reduce the quantization noise power in one or more frequency band(s) while amplifying it in other bands. Narrow-band noise shaping filters are state of the art in audio signal processing, analog-digital and digital-analog conversion, direct digital synthesis, and other applications. However, it is much more difficult to design broadband NS filters. Since NS filters are used in feedback branches, they must therefore be designed direct path free which imposes a constraint on the filter coefficients. This constraint leads to prohibitive large filter coefficients employing state of the art filter design techniques.This paper investigates the theoretical bound for NS filters and shows results about a novel design method for broadband FIR and IIR noise shaping filters and its multiplier-less hardware implementation. The method employed is a purely numerical approximation technique and leads to filter designs close to the discussed theoretical bound. The quantization of the filter coefficients is performed by a Canonical Signed Digit (CSD) representation of the coefficients. Two alternative architectures for the implementation of the filters are discussed. The design technique and the CSD quantization are realized in a toolbox. The filters were moreover implemented in VHDL.
Funder
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Hardware and Architecture,Modeling and Simulation,Information Systems,Signal Processing,Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference19 articles.
1. De Koning, D., & Verhelst, W. (2003). On psychoacoustic noise shaping for audio requantization. In: 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP ’03) (vol. 5, p. 453). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1200004
2. Wannamaker, R. (1992). Psychoacoustically optimal noise shaping. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 40, 611–620.
3. Dunn, C., & Sandler, M. (1997). Psychoacoustically optimal sigma-delta modulation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 45, 212–223.
4. Pavan, S., Schreier, R., & Temes, G. C. (2017). Understanding Delta-Sigma Data Converters. IEEE Press Series on Microelectronic Systems. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
5. Callegari, S., & Bizzarri, F. (2015). Optimal design of the noise transfer function of δσ modulators: IIR strategies, fir strategies, fir strategies with preassigned poles. Signal Processing, 114, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.02.001