Applicability of the DPRA on mixture testing: challenges and opportunities

Author:

Marcelis QuintenORCID,Deconinck Eric,Rogiers Vera,Vanhaecke Tamara,Desmedt Bart

Abstract

AbstractThe in chemico direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is validated to assess protein reactivity of chemical compounds, relating to the molecular initiating event of skin sensitization induction. According to OECD TG 442C, the DPRA is technically applicable to test multi-constituent substances and mixtures of known composition, even though limited experimental data are publicly available. First, we assessed the DPRA’s predictive capability for individual substances, but at concentrations other than the recommended 100 mM, i.e., based on the LLNA EC3 concentration (Experiment A). Next, the applicability of the DPRA to test unknown mixtures was assessed (Experiment B). Here, the complexity of unknown mixtures was reduced to mixtures containing either two known skin sensitizers with varying potencies, or a combination of a skin sensitizer with a non-skin sensitizer, or multiple non-sensitizers. Experiments A and B revealed that one extremely potent sensitizer (oxazolone) was incorrectly classified as a non-sensitizer when tested at its low EC3 concentration of 0.4 mM instead of the suggested molar excess conditions of 100 mM (Experiments A). For binary mixtures tested in experiments B, the DPRA was able to distinguish all skin sensitizers and the strongest skin sensitizer in the mixture was determinant for the overall peptide depletion of a sensitizer. In conclusion, we confirmed that the DPRA test method can be used efficiently for well-known characterized mixtures. However, when deviating from the recommended testing concentration of 100 mM, caution should be taken in case of negative results, limiting the DPRA’s applicability for mixtures of unknown composition.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Andres E, Sá-Rocha VM, Barrichello C et al (2013) The sensitivity of the KeratinoSens™ assay to evaluate plant extracts: a pilot study. Toxicol Vitr 27:1220–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.008

2. Chipinda I, Hettick JM, Siegel PD (2011) Haptenation: chemical reactivity and protein binding. J Allergy 2011:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/839682

3. European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys

4. European Commission (2019) Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. European Commission

5. European Commission Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3