How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response

Published:2013-08-04 Issue:12 Volume:87 Page:2063-2081
ISSN:0340-5761
Container-title:Archives of Toxicology
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Toxicol

Author:

Calabrese Edward J.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00204-013-1105-6.pdf

Reference94 articles.

1. American Philosophical Society (1946) Muller letter to Stern. Stern Papers, Muller File—Box 16, 12 Nov

2. American Philosophical Society (1947a) Stern letter to Muller, 22 Jan 1947

3. American Philosophical Society (1947b) Stern letter to Muller, 23 July 1947

4. American Philosophical Society (1947c) Stern letter to Muller (cable), 7 Aug 1947

5. American Philosophical Society (1947d) Muller letter to Stern, 8 Aug 1947

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Hermann J. Muller Viewed the Ernest Sternglass Contributions to Hereditary and Cancer Risk Assessment;Health Physics;2024-03

2. Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?;Science of The Total Environment;2024-03

3. Linear non-threshold (LNT) dose response and cancer risk assessment: An ongoing controversy;Encyclopedia of Toxicology;2024

4. Confirmation that Hermann Muller was dishonest in his Nobel Prize Lecture;Archives of Toxicology;2023-09-04

5. Thresholds for radiation induced mutation? The Muller-Evans debate: A turning point for cancer risk assessment;Chemico-Biological Interactions;2023-09