Abstract
AbstractThe EU chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) asserts that both human health and the environment are presently threatened and that further regulation is necessary. In a recent Guest Editorial, members of the German competent authority for risk assessment, the BfR, raised concerns about the scientific justification for this strategy. The complexity and interdependence of the networks of regulation of chemical substances have ensured that public health and wellbeing in the EU have continuously improved. A continuous process of improvement in consumer protection is clearly desirable but any initiative directed towards this objective must be based on scientific knowledge. It must not confound risk with other factors in determining policy. This conclusion is fully supported in the present Commentary including the request to improve both, data collection and the time-consuming and bureaucratic procedures that delay the publication of regulations.
Funder
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine
Reference2 articles.
1. European Commission (2019) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: the European green deal. COM (2019) 640 final, date: 2019–12–11. 52019DC0640—EN—EUR-Lex, European Union
2. Herzler M, Marx-Stoelting P, Pirow R, Riebeling C, Luch A, Tralau T, Schwerdtle T, Hensel A (2021) The “EU chemical strategy for sustainability” questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence? Arch Toxicol 95:2589–2601
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献