The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position

Author:

Barile Frank A.,Berry Sir Colin,Blaauboer Bas,Boobis Alan,Bolt Herrmann M.,Borgert Christopher,Dekant Wolfgang,Dietrich Daniel,Domingo Jose L.,Galli Corrado L.,Gori Gio Batta,Greim HelmutORCID,Hengstler Jan G.,Heslop-Harrison Pat,Kacew Sam,Marquardt Hans,Mally Angela,Pelkonen Olavi,Savolainen Kai,Testai Emanuela,Tsatsakis Aristides,Vermeulen Nico P.

Abstract

AbstractThe EU chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) asserts that both human health and the environment are presently threatened and that further regulation is necessary. In a recent Guest Editorial, members of the German competent authority for risk assessment, the BfR, raised concerns about the scientific justification for this strategy. The complexity and interdependence of the networks of regulation of chemical substances have ensured that public health and wellbeing in the EU have continuously improved. A continuous process of improvement in consumer protection is clearly desirable but any initiative directed towards this objective must be based on scientific knowledge. It must not confound risk with other factors in determining policy. This conclusion is fully supported in the present Commentary including the request to improve both, data collection and the time-consuming and bureaucratic procedures that delay the publication of regulations.

Funder

Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine

Reference2 articles.

1. European Commission (2019) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: the European green deal. COM (2019) 640 final, date: 2019–12–11. 52019DC0640—EN—EUR-Lex, European Union

2. Herzler M, Marx-Stoelting P, Pirow R, Riebeling C, Luch A, Tralau T, Schwerdtle T, Hensel A (2021) The “EU chemical strategy for sustainability” questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence? Arch Toxicol 95:2589–2601

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3