Author:
Guth Sabine,Hüser Stephanie,Roth Angelika,Degen Gisela,Diel Patrick,Edlund Karolina,Eisenbrand Gerhard,Engel Karl-Heinz,Epe Bernd,Grune Tilman,Heinz Volker,Henle Thomas,Humpf Hans-Ulrich,Jäger Henry,Joost Hans-Georg,Kulling Sabine E.,Lampen Alfonso,Mally Angela,Marchan Rosemarie,Marko Doris,Mühle Eva,Nitsche Michael A.,Röhrdanz Elke,Stadler Richard,van Thriel Christoph,Vieths Stefan,Vogel Rudi F.,Wascher Edmund,Watzl Carsten,Nöthlings Ute,Hengstler Jan G.
Abstract
AbstractRecently, epidemiological studies have suggested that fluoride is a human developmental neurotoxicant that reduces measures of intelligence in children, placing it into the same category as toxic metals (lead, methylmercury, arsenic) and polychlorinated biphenyls. If true, this assessment would be highly relevant considering the widespread fluoridation of drinking water and the worldwide use of fluoride in oral hygiene products such as toothpaste. To gain a deeper understanding of these assertions, we reviewed the levels of human exposure, as well as results from animal experiments, particularly focusing on developmental toxicity, and the molecular mechanisms by which fluoride can cause adverse effects. Moreover, in vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells were analyzed, and 23 epidemiological studies published since 2012 were considered. The results show that the margin of exposure (MoE) between no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal studies and the current adequate intake (AI) of fluoride (50 µg/kg b.w./day) in humans ranges between 50 and 210, depending on the specific animal experiment used as reference. Even for unusually high fluoride exposure levels, an MoE of at least ten was obtained. Furthermore, concentrations of fluoride in human plasma are much lower than fluoride concentrations, causing effects in cell cultures. In contrast, 21 of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence. The discrepancy between experimental and epidemiological evidence may be reconciled with deficiencies inherent in most of these epidemiological studies on a putative association between fluoride and intelligence, especially with respect to adequate consideration of potential confounding factors, e.g., socioeconomic status, residence, breast feeding, low birth weight, maternal intelligence, and exposure to other neurotoxic chemicals. In conclusion, based on the totality of currently available scientific evidence, the present review does not support the presumption that fluoride should be assessed as a human developmental neurotoxicant at the current exposure levels in Europe.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine
Reference168 articles.
1. Adamek E, Pawlowska-Goral K, Bober K (2005) In vitro and in vivo effects of fluoride ions on enzyme activity. Ann Acad Med Stetin 51(2):69–85
2. AFSSA (2003) Rapport du comité d'experts spécialisé “eaux” concernant la proposition de fixation d'une valeur limite du fluor dans les eaux minérales naturelles. Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Maisons-Alfort
3. Aggeborn L, Oehman M (2017) The effects of fluoride in drinking water. Uppsala: Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy, p. 1–83. https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2017/wp2017-20-the-effects-of-fluoride-in-the-drinking-water.pdf.
4. Anuradha CD, Kanno S, Hirano S (2001) Oxidative damage to mitochondria is a preliminary step to caspase-3 activation in fluoride-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Free Radic Biol Med 31(3):367–373
5. Aravind A, Dhanya RS, Narayan A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Kiran M (2016) Effect of fluoridated water on intelligence in 10–12-year-old school children. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 6(3):S237–S242
Cited by
136 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献