Comment on Slama R, Cyrys J, Herbarth O, Wichmann H-E, Heinrich J. saying: “The authors did not wish to reply, given Dr. Morfeld’s persistence in refusing to fill in the conflict of interest statement and in misleadingly quoting parts of the sentences of our publications”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comment on Slama R, Cyrys J, Herbarth O, Wichmann H-E, Heinrich J. saying: “The authors did not wish to reply, given Dr. Morfeld’s persistence in refusing to fill in the conflict of interest statement and in misleadingly quoting parts of the sentences of our publications”

Published:2009-06-19 Issue:7 Volume:83 Page:645-646
ISSN:0340-5761
Container-title:Archives of Toxicology
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Toxicol

Author:

Morfeld Peter

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00204-009-0448-5.pdf

Reference13 articles.

1. Acquavella JF (2006) Why focus only on financial interests? Epidemiology 17:248–249. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000198180.42227.a1

2. Claxton LD (2007) A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists. Toxicol Ind Health 23:557–571. doi: 10.1177/0748233708089046

3. Greenland S (2008) Commentary: addressing corporate influence through ethical guidelines. Int J Epidemiol 37:57–59. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym267

4. Ioannidis JPA (2008) Sequential discovery, thinking versus dredging, and shrink or sink. Epidemiology 19(5):657–658. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818207f6

5. Morfeld P (2009a) A plea for rigorous and honest science: false positive findings and biased presentations in epidemiological studies. Arch Toxicol 83:105–106. doi: 10.1007/s00204-008-0398-3

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The carcinogenicity debate on formaldehyde: How to derive safe exposure limits?;Archives of Toxicology;2010-05-18