Abstract
AbstractAs part of the safety assessment of salicylate esters in cosmetics, we developed a metabolism factor based on in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) to provide a better estimation of the aggregate internal exposure to the common metabolite, salicylic acid. Optimal incubation conditions using human liver S9 were identified before measuring salicylic acid formation from 31 substances. Four control substances, not defined as salicylic esters but which could be mistaken as such due to their nomenclature, did not form salicylic acid. For the remaining substances, higher in vitro intrinsic clearance (CLint, in vitro) values generally correlated with lower LogP values. A “High-Throughput Pharmacokinetic” (HTPK) model was used to extrapolate CLint, in vitro values to human in vivo clearance and half-lives. The latter were used to calculate the percentage of substance metabolised to salicylic acid in 24 h in vivo following human exposure to the ester, i.e. the “metabolism factor”. The IVIVE model correctly reproduced the observed elimination rate of 3 substances using in silico or in vitro input parameters. For other substances, in silico only-based predictions generally resulted in lower metabolism factors than when in vitro values for plasma binding and liver S9 CLint, in vitro were used. Therefore, in vitro data input provides the more conservative metabolism factors compared to those derived using on in silico input. In conclusion, these results indicate that not all substances contribute equally (or at all) to the systemic exposure to salicylic acid. Therefore, we propose a realistic metabolism correction factor by which the potential contribution of salicylate esters to the aggregate consumer exposure to salicylic acid from cosmetic use can be estimated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Boettcher M, Ebmeyer J, Krueger C-T, et al. (2023) Use of New Approach Methods for an Ab Initio Case Study for Dermal Exposure to Benzyl Salicylate present in a face cream Submitted to RTP
2. Burke A, Smyth E, FitGerald GA (2005) Chapter 26, Salicylates, page 687–692. In: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th Edition Edited by Laurence Brunton, John Lazo, and Keith Parker. McGraw Hill, New York
3. ECHA (2021) Assessment of regulatory needs. Group Name: Salicylate esters. Retrieved from [website]: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/1f78ce7a-68bc-7ec5-a828-b76851ea3f4d
4. Eilstein J, Grégoire S, Fabre A et al (2020) Use of human liver and EpiSkin™ S9 subcellular fractions as a screening assays to compare the in vitro hepatic and dermal metabolism of 47 cosmetics-relevant chemicals. J Appl Toxicol 40(3):416–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3914
5. Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Oksvold P et al (2014) Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(2):397–406. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.035600