Author:
Wang Lebing,Jin Jian Gang,Sun Lijun,Lee Der-Horng
Abstract
AbstractUrban rail transit (URT) disruptions present considerable challenges due to several factors: i) a high probability of occurrence, arising from facility failures, disasters, and vandalism; ii) substantial negative effects, notably the delay of numerous passengers; iii) an escalating frequency, attributable to the gradual aging of facilities; and iv) severe penalties, including substantial fines for abnormal operation. This article systematically reviews URT disruption management literature from the past decade, categorizing it into pre-disruption and post-disruption measures. The pre-disruption research focuses on reducing the effects of disruptions through network analysis, passenger behavior analysis, resource allocation for protection and backup, and enhancing system resilience. Conversely, post-disruption research concentrates on restoring normal operations through train rescheduling and bus bridging services. The review reveals that while post-disruption strategies are thoroughly explored, pre-disruption research is predominantly analytical, with a scarcity of practical pre-emptive solutions. Moreover, future research should focus more on increasing the interchangeability of transport modes, reinforcing redundancy relationships between URT lines, and innovating post-disruption strategies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. An S, Cui N, Li X, Ouyang Y (2013). Location planning for transit-based evacuation under the risk of service disruptions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 54: 1–16
2. Besinovic N, Wang Y, Zhu S, Quaglietta E, Tang T, Goverde R M P (2019). Integrated train and passenger disruption management for urban railway lines. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). Auckland: IEEE, 3182–3187
3. Binder S, Maknoon Y, Bierlaire M (2017). The multi-objective railway timetable rescheduling problem. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78: 78–94
4. Cacchiani V, Huisman D, Kidd M, Kroon L, Toth P, Veelenturf L, Wagenaar J (2014). An overview of recovery models and algorithms for real-time railway rescheduling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 63: 15–37
5. Cadarso L, Codina E, Escudero L F, Marín A (2017). Rapid transit network design: Considering recovery robustness and risk aversion measures. Transportation Research Procedia, 22: 255–264
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献