Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Opportunities exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM). Presenting patient-reported data, including patient treatment preferences, to oncologists before or during a treatment plan decision may improve patient engagement in treatment decisions.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the standard-of-care treatment planning process vs. a novel treatment planning process focused on SDM, which included oncologist review of patient-reported treatment preferences, prior to or during treatment decisions among women with MBC. The primary outcome was patient perception of shared decision-making. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, treatment satisfaction, physician perception of treatment decision-making, and use of treatment plans.
Results
Among the 109 evaluable patients from December 2018 to June 2022, 28% were Black and 12% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. Although not reaching statistical significance, patients in the intervention arm perceived SDM more often than patients in the control arm (63% vs. 59%; Cramer’s V = 0.05; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.55–2.57). Among patients in the intervention arm, 31% were at the highest level of patient activation compared to 19% of those in the control arm (V = 0.18). In 82% of decisions, the oncologist agreed that the patient-reported data helped them engage in SDM. In 45% of decision, they reported changing management due to patient-reported data.
Conclusions
Oncologist engagement in the treatment planning process, with oncologist review of patient-reported data, is a promising approach to improve patient participation in treatment decisions which should be tested in larger studies.
Trial registration
NCT03806738.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J et al (2022) Breast cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 20(6):691–722. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030
2. Sodergren SC, Copson E, White A et al (2016) Systematic review of the side effects associated with anti-HER2-targeted therapies used in the treatment of breast cancer, on behalf of the EORTC quality of life group. Target Oncol 11(3):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-015-0409-2
3. Moscetti L, Sperduti I, Frassoldati A et al (2021) Quality of life of therapies for hormone receptor positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer: regulatory aspects and clinical impact in Europe. Breast 59:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.008
4. Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG (2004) Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22(15):3091–3098. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069
5. Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ et al (2010) Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care 16(9):688–696
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献