Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Inflammatory breast cancer is a deadly and aggressive type of breast cancer. A key challenge relates to the need for a more detailed, formal, objective definition of IBC, the lack of which compromises clinical care, hampers the conduct of clinical trials, and hinders the search for IBC-specific biomarkers and treatments because of the heterogeneity of patients considered to have IBC.
Methods
Susan G. Komen, the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Milburn Foundation convened patient advocates, clinicians, and researchers to review the state of IBC and to propose initiatives to advance the field. After literature review of the defining clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of IBC, the experts developed a novel quantitative scoring system for diagnosis.
Results
The experts identified through consensus several “defining characteristics” of IBC, including factors related to timing of onset and specific symptoms. These reflect common pathophysiologic changes, sometimes detectable on biopsy in the form of dermal lymphovascular tumor emboli and often reflected in imaging findings. Based on the importance and extent of these characteristics, the experts developed a scoring scale that yields a continuous score from 0 to 48 and proposed cut-points for categorization that can be tested in subsequent validation studies.
Conclusion
To move beyond subjective ‘clinical diagnosis’ of IBC, we propose a quantitative scoring system to define IBC, based on clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. This system is intended to predict outcome and biology, guide treatment decisions and inclusion in clinical trials, and increase diagnostic accuracy to aid basic research; future validation studies are necessary to evaluate its performance.
Funder
Susan G. Komen
Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Milburn Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Lee B, Tannenbaum E (1924) Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 39:580–595
2. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, Jessup JM, Brierley JD, Gaspar LE, Schilsky RL, Balch CM, Winchester DP, Asare EA, Madera M, Gress DM, Meyer LR (eds) (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York
3. Lucas FV, Perez-Mesa C (1978) Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 41:1595–1605
4. Rea D, Francis A, Hanby AM, et al for the U. K. Inflammatory Breast Cancer Working group (2015) Inflammatory breast cancer: time to standardise diagnosis assessment and management, and for the joining of forces to facilitate effective research. Br J Cancer 112:1613–1615. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.115
5. White RE, Warren LE, Bellon JR, et al (2015) Risk factors for developing inflammatory breast cancer: unique trends among a single patient population. Cancer Res 75:P6-14-08.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献