Breast cancer worry in higher-risk women offered preventive therapy: a UK multicentre prospective study

Author:

Lloyd Kelly E.ORCID,Hall Louise H.ORCID,Ziegler LucyORCID,Smith Samuel G.ORCID,Adamson Vanessa,Ainsworth Sarah,Akerlund Malin,Baker Ivanna,Barwell Julian,Beesley Jayne,Brock Lisa,Butcher Chrissie,Carpenter Janice,Clark Martyn,Cocks Shirley,Conteh Veronica,Coulding Martina,Darby Sue,Duckworth Angela,Evans Gareth,Fensom Catherine,Fletcher Julie,Foster Kate,Grieg Sara,Gullaksen Elaine,Gurasashvili Jana,Hardstaff Lisa,Hart Rachel,Hoare Kathryn,Hoffman Jonathan,Holcombe Christopher,Horton Lynne,Howell Antony,Islam Farah,Jenkinson Emma,Jewers Karen,Joshi Manisha,Kirkby Amy,Kneeshaw Peter,Knife Natalie,Kokan Jalal,Li Jin,Lunt Nicola,Macmillan Douglas,Makinson Karen,Mallidis Evangelos,Manyangadze Sarah,Masvaure Charity,Mistry Raksha,Ngumo Alice,Ooi Jane,Patel Ashraf,Pope Vanessa,Price Laura,Rabson Fiona,Richardson Lisa,Ridgway Stephanie,Riley Karen,Roberts Lorraine,Ryan-Smith Janet,Salih Vian,Scott Nicky,Shere Mike,Sloan Andrew,Solanky Nita,Taylor Amanda,Thekkinkattil Dinesh,Thomas Heather,Thorat Mangesh,Townley Barbara,Vaidya Jayant S.,Wagstaff Lynda,Walsh Shane,Waring Lynsey,Watterson Donna,Westley Charlotte,Wilkinson Lesley,Willis Nicola,Wiseman Julia,

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Women’s worry about developing breast cancer may influence their decision to use preventive therapy. However, the direction of this relationship has been questioned. We prospectively investigated the relationship between breast cancer worry and uptake of preventive therapy. The socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with high breast cancer worry were also investigated. Methods Women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited from clinics across England (n = 408). Participants completed a survey on their breast cancer worry, socio-demographic and clinical factors. Uptake of tamoxifen was recorded at 3 months (n = 258 women, 63.2%). Both primary and sensitivity analyses were conducted using different classifications of low, medium and high worry. Results 39.5% of respondents reported medium breast cancer worry at baseline and 21.2% reported high worry. Ethnic minority women were more likely to report high worry than white women (OR = 3.02, 95%CI 1.02, 8.91, p = 0.046). Women educated below degree level were more likely to report high worry than those with higher education (OR = 2.29, 95%CI 1.28, 4.09, p = 0.005). No statistically significant association was observed between worry and uptake. In the primary analysis, fewer respondents with medium worry at baseline initiated tamoxifen (low worry = 15.5%, medium = 13.5%, high = 15.7%). In the sensitivity analysis, participants with medium worry reported the highest uptake of tamoxifen (19.7%). Conclusions No association was observed between worry and uptake, although the relationship was affected by the categorisation of worry. Standardised reporting of the classification of worry is warranted to allow transparent comparisons across cohorts.

Funder

Cancer Research UK

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference36 articles.

1. Lin L, Yan L, Liu Y, Yuan F, Li H, Ni J (2019) Incidence and death in 29 cancer groups in 2017 and trend analysis from 1990 to 2017 from the Global Burden of Disease Study. J Hematol Oncol 12(1):96

2. Steward WP, Brown K (2013) Cancer chemoprevention: a rapidly evolving field. Br J Cancer 109(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.280

3. Al Rabadi L, Bergan R (2017) A way forward for cancer chemoprevention: think local. Cancer Prev Res 10(1):14–35. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0194

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Familial breast cancer: classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG164. Accessed 17 Jun 2019

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Familial breast cancer: classification and care of people at risk of familial breast cancer and management of breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG164. Accessed 17 Jun 2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3