Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This retrospective, about a single “mobile” laboratory in six locations on two continents, is intended as a case study in discovery for trainees and junior faculty in the medical sciences. Your knowledge of your topic is necessary to expect the unexpected.
Historical method
In 1972, there was no tamoxifen, only ICI 46, 474, a non-steroidal anti-estrogen with little chance of clinical development. No one would ever be foolish enough to predict that the medicine, 20 years later, would achieve legendary status as the first targeted treatment for breast cancer, and millions of women would benefit from long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The secret of tamoxifen’s success was a translational research strategy proposed in the mid 1970’s. This strategy was to treat only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and deploy 5 or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy to prevent recurrence. Additionally, tamoxifen prevented mammary cancer in animals. Could the medicine prevent breast cancer in women?
Results
Tamoxifen and the failed breast cancer drug raloxifene became the first selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): a new drug group, discovered at the University of Wisconsin, Comprehensive Cancer Center. Serendipity can play a fundamental role in discovery, but there must be a rigorous preparation for the investigator to appreciate the possibility of a pending discovery. This article follows the unanticipated discoveries when PhD students “get the wrong answer.” The secret of success of my six Tamoxifen Teams was their technical excellence to create models, to decipher mechanisms, that drove the development of new medicines.
Summary of advances
Discoveries are listed that either changed women’s health or allowed an understanding of originally opaque mechanisms of action of potential therapies. These advances in women’s health were supported entirely by government-sponsored peer-reviewed funding and major philanthropy from the Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation, the Avon Foundation, and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The resulting lives saved or extended, families aided in a time of crisis and the injection of billions of dollars into national economies by drug development, is proof of the value of Federal or philanthropic investment into unencumbered research aimed at saving millions of lives.
Funder
MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grand
George and Barbara Bush Foundation for Innovative Cancer Research
Dallas/Fort Worth Living Legend Chair of Cancer Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference162 articles.
1. Watson, J, (2010) Avoid Boring People, Vintage Books, a division of Random House New York.
2. Smith DC, Prentice DJ, Thompson DJ, Herrmann WL (1975) Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial cancer. N Eng J Med 293:1164–1167. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197512042932302
3. Ziel HK, Finkle WD (1975) Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens. N Eng J Med 293:1169–1170. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197512042932303
4. Eig J (2015) The Birth of the Pill. Pan Macmillan a division of Macmillan Publishers LTD, London
5. Beutler E (2001) The treatment of acute leukemia: past, present, and future. Leukemia 15:658–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2402065
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献