Plasma ESR1 mutations and outcome to first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
-
Published:2023-05-25
Issue:2
Volume:200
Page:271-279
-
ISSN:0167-6806
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer Res Treat
Author:
Bos M. K.ORCID, Lam S. W., Motta G., Helmijr J. C. A., Beaufort C. M., de Jonge E., Martens J. W. M., Boven E., Jansen M. P. H. M., Jager A., Sleijfer S.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
ESR1 mutations have been identified as mechanism for endocrine resistance and are also associated with a decreased overall survival. We assessed ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for impact on outcome to taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients.
Methods
ESR1 mutations were determined in archived plasma samples from patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (AT arm, N = 91) in the randomized phase II ATX study. Samples collected at baseline (n = 51) and at cycle 2 (n = 13, C2) were analyzed using a breast cancer next-generation sequencing panel. This study was powered to detect a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) at six months for patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab compared to historical trials with fulvestrant. PFS, overall survival (OS), and ctDNA dynamics were exploratory analyses.
Results
PFS at six months was 86% (18/21) in patients with an ESR1 mutation detected and 85% (23/27) in wildtype ESR1 patients. In our exploratory analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months [95% CI, 7.6–8.8] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3–9.2] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.47]. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months [95% CI, 6.6–33.7] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 28.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.3–36.9] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.27]. Patients with ≥ two ESR1 mutations had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS, compared to those who did not [p = 0.003]. Change in ctDNA level at C2 was not different between ESR1 and other mutations.
Conclusions
Presence of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA might not be associated with inferior PFS and OS in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.
Funder
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference21 articles.
1. Angus L, Smid M, Wilting SM, van Riet J, Van Hoeck A, Nguyen L, Nik-Zainal S, Steenbruggen TG, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Labots M, van Riel JMGH, Bloemendal HJ, Steeghs N, Lolkema MP, Voest EE, van de Werken HJG, Jager A, Cuppen E, Sleijfer S, Martens JWM (2019) The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies. Nat Genet 51:1450–1458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0507-7 2. Bidard F-C, Hardy-Bessard A-C, Dalenc F, Bachelot T, Pierga J-Y, de la Motte RT, Sabatier R, Dubot C, Frenel J-S, Ferrero JM, Ladoire S, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Lortholary A, Grenier J, Chakiba C, Stefani L, Plaza JE, Clatot F, Teixeira L, D’Hondt V, Vegas H, Derbel O, Garnier-Tixidre C, Canon J-L, Pistilli B, André F, Arnould L, Pradines A, Bièche I, Callens C, Lemonnier J, Berger F, Delaloge S, Bidard F-C, Pistilli B, Dalenc F, Bachelot T, De La Motte RT, Sabatier R, Dubot C, Frenel J-S, Ferrero J-M, Ladoire S, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Hardy-Bessard A-C, Lortholary A, Grenier J, Chakiba C, Stefani L, Soulie P, Jacquin J-P, Plaza JE, Clatot F, Teixeira L, D’Hondt V, Vegas H, Derbel O, Garnier Tixidre C, Delbaldo C, Moreau L, Cheneau C, Paitel J-F, Bernard-Marty C, Spaeth D, Genet D, Moullet I, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Deiana L, Greilsamer C, Venat-Bouvet L, Delecroix V, Melis A, Orfeuvre H, Nguyen S, Legouffe E, Zannetti A, Le Scodan R, Dohollou N, Dalivoust P, Arsene O, Marques N, Petit T, Mollon D, Dauba J, Bonnin N, Morvan F, Gardner M, Marti A, Levache C-B, Lachaier E, Achille M, Valmar C, Bouaita R, Medioni J, Foa C, Bernard-Marty C, Del Piano F, Gozy M et al (2022) Switch to fulvestrant and palbociclib versus no switch in advanced breast cancer with rising ESR1 mutation during aromatase inhibitor and palbociclib therapy (PADA-1): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 23:1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00555-1 3. Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, Streich G, Montero AJ, Forget F, Mouret-Reynier M-A, Sohn JH, Taylor D, Harnden KK, Khong H, Kocsis J, Dalenc F, Dillon PM, Babu S, Waters S, Deleu I, García Sáenz JA, Bria E, Cazzaniga M, Lu J, Aftimos P, Cortés J, Liu S, Tonini G, Laurent D, Habboubi N, Conlan MG, Bardia A (2022) Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol 40:3246–3256. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.00338 4. Bidard FC, Hardy-Bessard A-C, Bachelot T (2021) Fulvestrant-palbociclib vs continuing AI-palbociclib upon detection of circulating ESR1 mutation in HR+ HER2- mBC patients: results of PADA-1, a UCBG-GINECO randomized phase 3 trial. In: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Virtual 5. Chandarlapaty S, Chen D, He W, Sung P, Samoila A, You D, Bhatt T, Patel P, Voi M, Gnant M, Hortobagyi G, Baselga J, Moynahan ME (2016) Prevalence of ESR1 mutations in cell-free DNA and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer: a secondary analysis of the BOLERO-2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2:1310–1315. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1279
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|